Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38130092›Full record

ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2024

Uncertainty analysis and updated user guidance for interspecies correlation estimation models and low toxicity compounds.

Sandy Raimondo, Crystal Lilavois, Shannon A Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandy RaimondoUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Crystal LilavoisUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Shannon A NelsonUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999US Environmental Protection Agency
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interspecies correlation estimation (ICE) models are log-linear relationships of acute sensitivity between two species that estimate the sensitivity of an untested species from the known sensitivity of a surrogate. As ICE model use increases globally, additional user guidance is required to ensure consistent use across chemicals and applications. The present study expands ICE uncertainty analyses and user guidance with a focus on low toxicity compounds whose acute values (i.e., reported as mg/L) can be greater than those used to develop a model. In these cases, surrogate values may be outside the ICE model domain and require additional extrapolations to predict acute toxicity. We use the extensive, standardized acute toxicity database underlying ICE models to broadly summarize inter-test variability of acute toxicity data as a measure by which model prediction accuracy can be evaluated. Using the data and models found on the USEPA Web-ICE (www3.epa.gov/webice), we created a set of "truncated" models from data corresponding to the lower 75th percentile of surrogate toxicity. We predicted toxicity for chemicals in the upper 25th percentile as both μg/L beyond the model domain and converted to mg/L (i.e., "scaled" value) and compared these predictions with those from cross-validation of whole ICE models and to the measured value. For ICE models with slopes in the range 0.66-1.33, prediction accuracy of scaled values did not differ from the accuracy of the models when data were entered as μg/L within or beyond the model domain. An uncertainty analysis of ICE confidence intervals was conducted and an interval range of two orders of magnitude was determined to minimize type I and II errors when accepting or rejecting ICE predictions. We updated the ICE user guidance based on these analyses to advance the state of the science for ICE model application and interpretation. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1554-1565. Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsUncertaintyWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, ChemicalAcute toxicityEcological Risk AssessmentInterspecies extrapolationNew Approach Methodology

Identifiers

PMID38130092
PMCPMC12199407
OpenAlexW4390112399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.