ReviewBiophysical journal2024
Resurgent current in context: Insights from the structure and function of Na and K channels.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sodium Channel Inhibitors in Clinical Development for Pain Management: A Focused Review.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Effects of open-channel blocking peptides in NaBiophysical journal · 2025Article
- Modulation of human dorsal root ganglion neuron firing by the Nav1.8 inhibitor suzetrigine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Effects of transient, persistent, and resurgent sodium currents on excitability and spike regularity in vestibular ganglion neurons.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Molecular determinants of resurgent sodium currents mediated by Navβ4 peptide and A-type FHFs.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discovered just over 25 years ago in cerebellar Purkinje neurons, resurgent Na current was originally described operationally as a component of voltage-gated Na current that flows upon repolarization from relatively depolarized potentials and speeds recovery from inactivation, increasing excitability. Its presence in many excitable cells and absence from others has raised questions regarding its biophysical and molecular mechanisms. Early studies proposed that Na channels capable of generating resurgent current are subject to a rapid open-channel block by an endogenous blocking protein, which binds upon depolarization and unblocks upon repolarization. Since the time that this mechanism was suggested, many physiological and structural studies of both Na and K channels have revealed aspects of gating and conformational states that provide insights into resurgent current. These include descriptions of domain movements for activation and inactivation, solution of cryo-EM structures with pore-blocking compounds, and identification of native blocking domains, proteins, and modulatory subunits. Such results not only allow the open-channel block hypothesis to be refined but also link it more clearly to research that preceded it. This review considers possible mechanisms for resurgent Na current in the context of earlier and later studies of ion channels and suggests a framework for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.