ArticleAsian spine journal2024
Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced systems for intraoperative cartilage evaluation and treatment demonstrate early feasibility and a shift towards integrating artificial intelligence: A scoping review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Spine Surgery : A Narrative Review of Performance Paradox and Clinical Integration Challenges.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Bridging the Great Discordance: Ontological Intelligence as the New Paradigm in Spine Surgery.Neurospine · 2026Article
- Development and multi-institutional validation of a deep learning algorithm for predicting cervical cord compression using dynamic cervical lateral radiographs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hierarchical deep learning pipeline for robust cervical parameter measurement in radiographs with C7 obscuration.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Application of Deep Learning for Spine MRI Interpretation: A Multicenter Evaluation of Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted versus Manual Reading on Diagnostic Agreement with the Reference Standard.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in orthopedic medical education: A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) Agents Versus Agentic AI: What's the Effect in Spine Surgery?Neurospine · 2025Article
- Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A systematic review of biportal endoscopic spinal surgery with interbody fusion.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Advancing the future of endoscopic spine surgery.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Endoscopic spine surgery for obesity-related surgical challenges: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Patient Perspectives in Full Endoscopic Cervical Surgery: A Systematic Review.Neurospine · 2025Article
- Performance and clinical implications of machine learning models for detecting cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Classification for Detecting and Grading Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.Spine surgery and related research · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models.Neurospine · 2024Article
- Commentary on "The Utility and Feasibility of Smart Glasses in Spine Surgery: Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion".Neurospine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence: a new cutting-edge tool in spine surgery.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review summarizes existing evidence and outlines the benefits of artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery. The popularity of artificial intelligence has grown significantly, demonstrating its benefits in computer-assisted surgery and advancements in spinal treatment. This study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), a set of reporting guidelines specifically designed for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The search strategy used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, including "MeSH (Artificial intelligence)," "Spine" AND "Spinal" filters, in the last 10 years, and English- from January 1, 2013, to October 31, 2023. In total, 442 articles fulfilled the first screening criteria. A detailed analysis of those articles identified 220 that matched the criteria, of which 11 were considered appropriate for this analysis after applying the complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 11 studies met the eligibility criteria. Analysis of these studies revealed the types of artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery. No evidence suggests the superiority of assisted spine surgery with or without artificial intelligence in terms of outcomes. In terms of feasibility, accuracy, safety, and facilitating lower patient radiation exposure compared with standard fluoroscopic guidance, artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery produced satisfactory and superior outcomes. The incorporation of artificial intelligence with augmented and virtual reality appears promising, with the potential to enhance surgeon proficiency and overall surgical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.