Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129979›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2023

Bacillus-based probiotic cleansers reduce the formation of dry biofilms on common hospital surfaces.

Richard Wormald, Paul N Humphreys, Christopher J Charles, Simon P Rout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard WormaldDepartment of Biological and Geographical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Paul N HumphreysDepartment of Biological and Geographical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3431-7930
Christopher J CharlesGenesis Biosciences, Cardiff, UK.
Simon P RoutDepartment of Biological and Geographical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5778-6145

Funding

National Biofilm Innovation Centre BB/R012415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of liquid suspension, dry biofilms can form upon hard surfaces within a hospital environment, representing a healthcare-associated infection risk. Probiotic cleansers using generally recognized as safe organisms, such as those of the Bacillus genus, represent a potential strategy for the reduction of dry biofilm bioburden. The mechanisms of action and efficacy of these cleaners are, however, poorly understood. To address this, a preventative dry biofilm assay was developed using steel, melamine, and ceramic surfaces to assess the ability of a commercially available Bacillus spp. based probiotic cleanser to reduce the surface bioburden of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Via this assay, phosphate-buffered saline controls were able to generate dry biofilms within 7 days of incubation, with the application of the probiotic cleanser able to prevent >97.7% of dry biofilm formation across both pathogen analogs and surface types. Further to this, surfaces treated with the probiotic mixture alone also showed a reduction in dry biofilm across both pathogen and surface types. Confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging indicated that the probiotic bacteria were able to germinate and colonize surfaces, likely forming a protective layer upon these hard surfaces.

Indexed as

BacillusProbioticsBiofilmsHospitalsStaphylococcus aureusBacillusbiofilmCLSM-FISHprobioticsurface

Identifiers

PMID38129979
PMCPMC10664183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.