Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129965›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2024

Predictive modeling algorithms for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the current literature.

Isaac Seow-En, Ye Xin Koh, Yun Zhao, Boon Hwee Ang, Ivan En-Howe Tan, Aik Yong Chok, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Marianne Kit Har Au

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isaac Seow-EnDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-6812
Ye Xin KohDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-4174
Yun ZhaoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4093-4695
Boon Hwee AngGroup Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4144-1762
Ivan En-Howe TanGroup Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-1367
Aik Yong ChokDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-9664
Emile John Kwong Wei TanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0771-5063
Marianne Kit Har AuGroup Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-0962
SingHealth · SGSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess the quality and performance of predictive models for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM). A systematic review was performed to identify relevant studies from various databases. Studies that described or validated predictive models for CRCLM were included. The methodological quality of the predictive models was assessed. Model performance was evaluated by the reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Of the 117 articles screened, seven studies comprising 14 predictive models were included. The distribution of included predictive models was as follows: radiomics (n = 3), logistic regression (n = 3), Cox regression (n = 2), nomogram (n = 3), support vector machine (SVM, n = 2), random forest (n = 2), and convolutional neural network (CNN, n = 2). Age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tumor staging (T and N stage) were the most frequently used clinicopathological predictors for CRCLM. The mean AUCs ranged from 0.697 to 0.870, with 86% of the models demonstrating clear discriminative ability (AUC > 0.70). A hybrid approach combining clinical and radiomic features with SVM provided the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.870. The overall risk of bias was identified as high in 71% of the included studies. This review highlights the potential of predictive modeling to accurately predict the occurrence of CRCLM. Integrating clinicopathological and radiomic features with machine learning algorithms demonstrates superior predictive capabilities.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerLiver metastasisPredictionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38129965
PMCPMC10896689
OpenAlexW4390110727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.