Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129903›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2023

Differences in buprenorphine prescribing readiness among primary care professionals with and without X-waiver training in the US.

Berkeley Franz, Lindsay Y Dhanani, O Trent Hall, Daniel L Brook, Janet E Simon, William C Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Berkeley FranzOhio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Appalachian Institute to Advance Health Equity Science, Athens, OH, USA. franzb@ohio.edu.
Lindsay Y DhananiRutgers University School of Management and Labor Relations, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
O Trent HallDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Daniel L BrookOhio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA.
Janet E SimonOhio University College of Health Sciences and Professions, Athens, OH, USA.
William C MillerGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ohio University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Developing a Tailored Stigma Reduction Intervention to Increase Buprenorphine Prescribing among Rural Primary Care Providers in OhioR34DA057160 · NIDA · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI FRANZ, BERKELEY · 2022 to 2024
$698k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA057160NIDA NIH HHS R34DA057160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are effective at preventing overdose and infectious disease but are vastly under-prescribed in the US. For decades, prescribers faced additional training and regulation to prescribe buprenorphine which stigmatized the medication and lessened support for a harm reduction approach to treating opioid use disorder. The Drug Enforcement Administration removed the X-waiver requirement for prescribing buprenorphine in late 2022, which removed stigma and lessened important barriers to prescribing but also left training at the discretion of individual organizations. Our study aimed to assess differences in knowledge, confidence, and stigma regarding buprenorphine between those who went through the X-waiver training and those who did not, among practicing primary care providers (PCPs).

methodsWe assessed buprenorphine prescribing readiness among primary care aligned outpatient providers in Ohio, USA. Using survey data, we conducted bivariate and regression analyses predicting primary prescribing outcomes. Primary outcomes measured knowledge of and confidence in buprenorphine, as well as perceived adequacy of one's training. Secondary outcomes were attitudes toward patients with OUD, including bias toward OUD patients, stress when working with them, and empathy toward them. Participants (n = 403) included physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants practicing in primary care aligned disciplines.

resultsSurvey data showed that PCPs who received X-waiver training were more likely to understand and have confidence in the mechanism of buprenorphine, and consider their training on treating OUD to be adequate. PCPs with an X-waiver showed more empathy, less negative bias, and experienced less stress when working with patients with OUD.

conclusionRemoving restrictive policies for prescribing buprenorphine is an important step to expanding access and reducing the stigma associated with opioid use disorder treatment. Yet, our findings suggest that the training received alongside regulation may be important for improving prescribing confidence and reducing stigma. Strategies to increase buprenorphine prescribing are unlikely to be effective without also expanding access to prescribing support for primary care providers across the career course.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersHumansOpiate Substitution TreatmentPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBuprenorphineAddiction medicineBuprenorphineMedications for opioid use disorderMisinformationOpioid-related disordersPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID38129903
PMCPMC10740221
OpenAlexW4390060931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.