Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129859›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Occupational exposures and cancer risk in commercial laundry and dry cleaning industries: a scoping review.

Emma Ann Landskroner, Candace Su-Jung Tsai

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma Ann LandskronerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, 650 Charles E. Young Drive S., MC 177220, 90095-1735, 90095-1735, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Candace Su-Jung TsaiDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, 650 Charles E. Young Drive S., MC 177220, 90095-1735, 90095-1735, Los Angeles, California, United States. candacetsai@ucla.edu.
UCLA Health · US

Funding

Occupational and Environmental Exposures and Work Practices for Nanomaterials and Electronic ProductsR25ES033043 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TSAI, CANDACE SUJUNG · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R25 ES033043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe laundry and dry cleaning industries are critical for maintaining cleanliness and hygiene in our daily lives. However, they have also been identified as sources of hazardous chemical exposure for workers, leading to potentially severe health implications. Despite mounting evidence that solvents like perchloroethylene and trichloroethylene are carcinogenic, they remain commonly used in the industry. Additionally, while alternative solvents are increasingly being utilized in response to indications of adverse health and environmental effects, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of the potential risks associated with exposure to these new agents.

methodsThis study aims to identify gaps in the literature concerning worker exposure to contemporary toxic chemicals in the laundry and dry cleaning industry and their associated carcinogenic risks. A scoping review of peer-reviewed publications from 2012 to 2022 was conducted to achieve this objective, focusing on studies that detailed chemical exposures, sampling methods, and workers within the laundry and dry cleaning sector.

resultsIn this scoping review, 12 relevant papers were assessed. A majority (66%) examined perchloroethylene exposure, with one notable finding revealing that biomarkers from dry cleaners had significant micronuclei frequency and DNA damage, even when exposed to PCE at levels below occupational exposure limits. Similarly, another study supported these results, finding an increase in early DNA damage among exposed workers. Separate studies on TCE and benzene presented varied exposure levels and health risks, raising concern due to their IARC Group 1 carcinogen classification. Information on alternative solvents was limited, highlighting gaps in health outcome data, exposure guidelines, and carcinogenic classifications.

conclusionResearch on health outcomes, specifically carcinogenicity from solvent exposure in dry cleaning, is limited, with 66% of studies not monitoring health implications, particularly for emerging solvents. Further, findings indicated potential DNA damage from perchloroethylene, even below set occupational limits, emphasizing the need to reevaluate safety limits. As alternative solvents like butylal and high-flashpoint hydrocarbons become more prevalent, investigations into the effects of their exposure are necessary to safeguard workers' health. This scoping review is registered with the Open Science Framework, registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Q8FR3 .

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOccupational ExposureTetrachloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneHumansHydrocarbonsSolventsHydrocarbonsSolventsTetrachloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneCancerDry cleaning industryHazardous chemical exposureIndoor solvent exposureOccupational exposures

Identifiers

PMID38129859
PMCPMC10740271
OpenAlexW4390061920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.