Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129824›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

An iterative approach to developing a multifaceted implementation strategy for a complex eHealth intervention within clinical practice.

Renée V H IJzerman, Rosalie van der Vaart, Linda D Breeman, Karin Arkenbout, Mike Keesman, Roderik A Kraaijenhagen, Andrea W M Evers, Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer, Veronica R Janssen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Renée V H IJzermanHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333, the Netherlands. r.v.h.ijzerman@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
Rosalie van der VaartCentre of expertise Health Innovation, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Linda D BreemanHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333, the Netherlands.
Karin ArkenboutDepartment of Cardiology, Tergooi MC, Blaricum and Hilversum, the Netherlands.
Mike KeesmanHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333, the Netherlands.
Roderik A KraaijenhagenVital10, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Andrea W M EversHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333, the Netherlands.
Wilma J M Scholte Op ReimerDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Veronica R JanssenDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLTergooi · NLThe Hague University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

The Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative: An Initiative with the support of the Dutch Heart Foundation and ZonMw (The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development) CVON2016-12 BENEFIT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of complex eHealth interventions has increased considerably. Despite available implementation theory outlining well-designed strategies, implementing complex interventions within practice proves challenging and often does not lead to sustainable use. To improve sustainability, theory and practice should be addressed during the development of an implementation strategy. By subsequently transparently reporting the executed theory-based steps and their corresponding practice findings, others can learn from these valuable lessons learned. This study outlines the iterative approach by which a multifaceted implementation strategy for a complex eHealth intervention in clinical practice was developed, tested and refined.

methodsWe implemented the BENEFIT program, an advanced eHealth platform with Personal Health Portal facilitating healthy living in cardiac patients. In six iterative phases alternating between theory and practice, the implementation strategy was developed, tested and refined. The initial implementation strategy (phase 1) was drawn up using the Implementation model and RE-AIM. Subsequently, this strategy was further updated in brainstorming sessions and group discussions with twenty key stakeholders from three cardiac care centres and then evaluated in a pilot (phases 2 and 3).

resultsThe pilot of the program led to the identification of (context-specific) key challenges in practice (phase 4), which were subsequently connected back to broader theory (phase 5) using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR). In the final phase, practice recommendations tackling the key challenges were formulated (phase 6) based on CFIR theory, the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool, and stakeholders' input and feedback. These recommendations were then added to the refined strategy. Thus, executing this approach led to the realisation and use of a multifaceted theory-informed practice-based implementation strategy.

conclusionThis case study gives an in-depth description of an iterative approach to developing an evidence-based, practice-tailored strategy for implementing a complex eHealth intervention in cardiac care. As such, this study may serve as a blueprint for other researchers aspiring to implement complex eHealth interventions within clinical practice sustainably.

Indexed as

TelemedicineEvidence-Based PracticeHumansDelivery of health careeHealtheHealth interventionImplementationImplementation strategyRoutine practice

Identifiers

PMID38129824
PMCPMC10740292
OpenAlexW4390048005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.