Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129793›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2023

Dissection of QTLs conferring drought tolerance in B. carinata derived B. juncea introgression lines.

Omkar Maharudra Limbalkar, Prashant Vasisth, Guman Singh, Priyanka Jain, Mohit Sharma, Rajendra Singh, Gokulan Dhanasekaran, Manish Kumar, Mohan Lal Meena, Mir Asif Iquebal and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Source-sink relationship inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Omkar Maharudra LimbalkarDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Prashant VasisthDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Guman SinghICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Sewar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India.
Priyanka JainDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Mohit SharmaDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Rajendra SinghDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Gokulan DhanasekaranDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Manish KumarDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Mohan Lal MeenaDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Mir Asif IquebalDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sarika JaiswalDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Mahesh RaoICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Anshul WattsICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Ramcharan BhattacharyaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Kunwar Harendra SinghICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Sewar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India.
Dinesh KumarDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Naveen SinghDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India. ns1.genet@gmail.com.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research · INIndian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute · INNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · INDirectorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INAmity University · INSri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner · IN

Funding

Omkar Maharudra Limbalkar miscellenous
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrought is one of the important abiotic stresses that can significantly reduce crop yields. In India, about 24% of Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) cultivation is taken up under rainfed conditions, leading to low yields due to moisture deficit stress. Hence, there is an urgent need to improve the productivity of mustard under drought conditions. In the present study, a set of 87 B. carinata-derived B. juncea introgression lines (ILs) was developed with the goal of creating drought-tolerant genotypes.

methodThe experiment followed the augmented randomized complete block design with four blocks and three checks. ILs were evaluated for seed yield and its contributing traits under both rainfed and irrigated conditions in three different environments created by manipulating locations and years. To identify novel genes and alleles imparting drought tolerance, Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) analysis was carried out. Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) approach was used to construct the linkage map.

resultsThe linkage map consisted of 5,165 SNP markers distributed across 18 chromosomes and spanning a distance of 1,671.87 cM. On average, there was a 3.09 cM gap between adjoining markers. A total of 29 additive QTLs were identified for drought tolerance; among these, 17 (58.6% of total QTLs detected) were contributed by B. carinata (BC 4), suggesting a greater contribution of B. carinata towards improving drought tolerance in the ILs. Out of 17 QTLs, 11 (64.7%) were located on the B genome, indicating more introgression segments on the B genome of B. juncea. Eight QTL hotspots, containing two or more QTLs, governing seed yield contributing traits, water use efficiency, and drought tolerance under moisture deficit stress conditions were identified. Seventeen candidate genes related to biotic and abiotic stresses, viz., SOS2, SOS2 like, NPR1, FAE1-KCS, HOT5, DNAJA1, NIA1, BRI1, RF21, ycf2, WRKY33, PAL, SAMS2, orf147, MAPK3, WRR1 and SUS, were reported in the genomic regions of identified QTLs.

conclusionsThe significance of B. carinata in improving drought tolerance and WUE by introducing genomic segments in Indian mustard is well demonstrated. The findings also provide valuable insights into the genetic basis of drought tolerance in mustard and pave the way for the development of drought-tolerant varieties.

Indexed as

Drought ResistanceQuantitative Trait LociChromosome MappingGenotypeMustard PlantPhenotypeBrassica carinataDrought tolerance indicesIndian mustardInterspecific hybridizationQTL hotspotWater use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID38129793
PMCPMC10740311
OpenAlexW4390060934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.