Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129708›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning network and radiomics models for differentiating tumor stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Hongfan Liao, Jiang Yuan, Chunhua Liu, Jiao Zhang, Yaying Yang, Hongwei Liang, Song Jiang, Shanxiong Chen, Yongmei Li, Yanbing Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongfan Liao *College of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Jiang Yuan *College of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Chunhua LiuDepartment of Radiology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jiao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yaying YangDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Medicine and Cancer Research Center, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Hongwei LiangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Song JiangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing Ping An Medical Imaging Diagnosis Center, Chongqing, China.
Shanxiong Chen *College of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China. csxpml@163.com.
Yongmei Li *Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China. lymzhang70@aliyun.com.
Yanbing Liu *College of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China. liuyanbingcqmu@163.com.

Funding

Intelligent Medicine Research Project of Chongqing Medical University YJSZHYX202211)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to compare the feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning network and radiomics models in differentiating low tumor stroma ratio (TSR) from high TSR in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 207 PDAC patients from three centers (training cohort: n = 160; test cohort: n = 47). TSR was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained specimens by experienced pathologists and divided as low TSR and high TSR. Deep learning and radiomics models were developed including ShuffulNetV2, Xception, MobileNetV3, ResNet18, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR). Additionally, the clinical models were constructed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were conducted to compare the overall survival time between different TSR groups.

resultsTo differentiate low TSR from high TSR, the deep learning models based on ShuffulNetV2, Xception, MobileNetV3, and ResNet18 achieved AUCs of 0.846, 0.924, 0.930, and 0.941, respectively, outperforming the radiomics models based on SVM, KNN, RF, and LR with AUCs of 0.739, 0.717, 0.763, and 0.756, respectively. Resnet 18 achieved the best predictive performance. The clinical model based on T stage alone performed worse than deep learning models and radiomics models. The survival analysis based on 142 of the 207 patients demonstrated that patients with low TSR had longer overall survival.

conclusionsDeep learning models demonstrate feasibility and superiority over radiomics in differentiating TSR in PDAC. The tumor stroma ratio in the PDAC microenvironment plays a significant role in determining prognosis. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The objective was to compare the feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning networks and radiomics models in identifying the tumor-stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Our findings demonstrate deep learning models exhibited superior performance compared to traditional radiomics models. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning demonstrates better performance than radiomics in differentiating tumor-stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. • The tumor-stroma ratio in the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma microenvironment plays a protective role in prognosis. • Preoperative prediction of tumor-stroma ratio contributes to clinical decision-making and guiding precise medicine.

Indexed as

Deep learningMachine learningPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaRadiomicsTumor stroma ratio

Identifiers

PMID38129708
PMCPMC10739634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.