ArticleInsights into imaging2023
Feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning network and radiomics models for differentiating tumor stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Predicting Transarterial Chemoembolization Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Combined dual-phase CT radiomics and deep transfer learning model for oxaliplatin response in unresectable colorectal liver metastases.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Comparing deep-learning, radiomics, and fusion models for parathyroid tumor classification using ultrasound: a multicenter retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Predicting induction chemotherapy response based on tumor-stroma ratio and pretreatment synthetic MRI in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative Prognostic Roles of β-Catenin Expression and Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Pancreatic Cancer: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy vs. Upfront Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Nomogram for predicting tumor-stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using dual-energy computed tomography.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a multi-modality system combining radiomics and deep learning for predicting mid-pregnancy complications and enabling timely pregnancy care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- One novel transfer learning-based CLIP model combined with self-attention mechanism for differentiating the tumor-stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to compare the feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning network and radiomics models in differentiating low tumor stroma ratio (TSR) from high TSR in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 207 PDAC patients from three centers (training cohort: n = 160; test cohort: n = 47). TSR was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained specimens by experienced pathologists and divided as low TSR and high TSR. Deep learning and radiomics models were developed including ShuffulNetV2, Xception, MobileNetV3, ResNet18, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR). Additionally, the clinical models were constructed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were conducted to compare the overall survival time between different TSR groups.
resultsTo differentiate low TSR from high TSR, the deep learning models based on ShuffulNetV2, Xception, MobileNetV3, and ResNet18 achieved AUCs of 0.846, 0.924, 0.930, and 0.941, respectively, outperforming the radiomics models based on SVM, KNN, RF, and LR with AUCs of 0.739, 0.717, 0.763, and 0.756, respectively. Resnet 18 achieved the best predictive performance. The clinical model based on T stage alone performed worse than deep learning models and radiomics models. The survival analysis based on 142 of the 207 patients demonstrated that patients with low TSR had longer overall survival.
conclusionsDeep learning models demonstrate feasibility and superiority over radiomics in differentiating TSR in PDAC. The tumor stroma ratio in the PDAC microenvironment plays a significant role in determining prognosis. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The objective was to compare the feasibility and effectiveness of automatic deep learning networks and radiomics models in identifying the tumor-stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Our findings demonstrate deep learning models exhibited superior performance compared to traditional radiomics models. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning demonstrates better performance than radiomics in differentiating tumor-stroma ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. • The tumor-stroma ratio in the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma microenvironment plays a protective role in prognosis. • Preoperative prediction of tumor-stroma ratio contributes to clinical decision-making and guiding precise medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.