Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129583›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2024

Personhood as projection: the value of multiple conceptions of personhood for understanding the dehumanisation of people living with dementia.

Paula Boddington, Andy Northcott, Katie Featherstone

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula BoddingtonGeller Institute of Aging and Memory, University of West London, St Mary's Road Ealing, London, SW5 5RF, UK. paula.boddington@uwl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-3678
Andy NorthcottGeller Institute of Aging and Memory, University of West London, St Mary's Road Ealing, London, SW5 5RF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-9861
Katie FeatherstoneGeller Institute of Aging and Memory, University of West London, St Mary's Road Ealing, London, SW5 5RF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-8425

Funding

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 13/10/80, 15/136/37, 132903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the concept of personhood in relation to people living with dementia and implications for the humanity of care, drawing on a body of ethnographic work. Much debate has searched for an adequate account of the person for these purposes. Broad contrasts can be made between accounts focusing on cognition and mental faculties, and accounts focusing on embodied and relational aspects of the person. Some have suggested the concept of the person is critical for good care; others suggest the vexed debates mean that the concept should be abandoned. We argue instead that the competing accounts illuminate the very tensions in personhood which are manifest for all of us, but especially for people living with dementia, and argue that our account has explanatory power in shedding light on how precisely dehumanisation and constraints on agency may arise for people living with dementia, and for staff, within an institutional context.

Indexed as

DementiaPopulation HealthAnthropology, CulturalDehumanizationHumansPersonhoodDehumanisationDementiaHospitalsPerson-centred carePersonhood

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.