Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129578›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review.

Paolo Cotogni, Clare Shaw, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca, Dominic Partridge, David Pritchett, Neil Webb, Amy Crompton, Pilar Garcia-Lorda, Julian Shepelev

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paolo CotogniPain Management and Palliative Care, Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Molinette Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy. paolo.cotogni@unito.it.
Clare ShawBiomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden and Institute of Cancer Research, London and Sutton, UK.
Paula Jimenez-FonsecaHospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Dominic PartridgeSource Health Economics, Oxford, UK.
David PritchettSource Health Economics, Oxford, UK.
Neil WebbSource Health Economics, Oxford, UK.
Amy CromptonSource Health Economics, Oxford, UK.
Pilar Garcia-LordaOpen University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Julian ShepelevWorldwide Medical, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Baxter Healthcare SA, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUp to 83% of oncology patients are affected by cancer-related malnutrition, depending on tumour location and patient age. Parenteral nutrition can be used to manage malnutrition, but there is no clear consensus as to the optimal protein dosage. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify studies on malnourished oncology patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) where protein or amino acid delivery was reported in g/kg bodyweight/day, and to compare outcomes between patients receiving low (< 1 g/kg bodyweight/day), standard (1-1.5 g/kg/day), and high-protein doses (> 1.5 g/kg/day).

methodsLiterature searches were performed on 5

resultsNineteen publications were included; sixteen investigated standard protein, two reported low protein, and one included both, but none assessed high-protein doses. Only one randomised controlled trial (RCT) was identified; all other studies were observational studies. The only study to compare two protein doses reported significantly greater weight gain in patients receiving 1.15 g/kg/day than those receiving 0.77 g/kg/day.

conclusionAt present, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal protein dosage for malnourished oncology patients receiving HPN. Data from non-HPN studies and critically ill patients indicate that high-protein interventions are associated with increased overall survival and quality of life; further studies are needed to establish whether the same applies in malnourished oncology patients.

Indexed as

MalnutritionNeoplasmsParenteral Nutrition, HomeHumansHigh proteinMalnutritionOncologyParenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID38129578
PMCPMC10739567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.