Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A pilot study of non-invasive diagnostic tools to detect Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease.

En-Chih Liao, Ching-Hsiang Yu, Jian-Han Lai, Ching-Chung Lin, Chih-Jen Chen, Wen-Han Chang, Ding-Kuo Chien

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acid peptic disorder compass: An Indian expert consensus on comprehensive management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Non-invasive Diagnostic Methods forMiddle East journal of digestive diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Advances in Diagnostic Modalities forLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

En-Chih Liao *Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ching-Hsiang Yu *Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jian-Han LaiDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ching-Chung LinDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chih-Jen ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Han ChangDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ding-Kuo ChienDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan. mmhter2017@gmail.com.
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWMackay Medical University · TWMackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management · TWNational Taipei University of Technology · TW

Funding

Company hospital cooperation project from Taiwan Carbon Nano Technology Corporation HP100MacKay Medical College MMC-RD-111-1B-P018MacKay Memorial Hospital MMH-MM-11013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection can lead to various digestive system diseases, making accurate diagnosis crucial. However, not all available tests are equally non-invasive and sensitive. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of non-invasive and invasive diagnostic tools for H. pylori infection and assess their correlation with esophagogastroduodenoscopic (EGD) findings. The study utilized the Campylobacter-Like Organism (CLO) test, serum anti-HP IgG blood test, and C-13-urea breath test (UBT) to diagnose H. pylori infection. A total of 100 patients with peptic ulcer symptoms, including 45 males and 55 females, were recruited for the study. Symptomatic patients between the ages of 20-70, eligible for EGD examination, were enrolled. Each diagnostic test and any combination of two positive tests were considered the reference standard and compared against the other diagnostic methods. Additionally, the relationship between these diagnostic tests and EGD findings was evaluated. Among the participants, 74.0% were diagnosed with peptic ulcer disease through EGD. The UBT demonstrated the highest Youden's index, ranging from 58 to 100%, against all the non-invasive tests. The IgG blood test displayed the highest sensitivity at 100%, with a specificity of 60-70%. On the other hand, the CLO test exhibited the highest specificity at 100% and a sensitivity of 50-85%. Furthermore, only the CLO test showed a significant association with esophageal ulcers (p-value = 0.01). The IgG blood test holds promise as a primary screening tool due to its exceptional sensitivity. While the UBT is relatively expensive, its non-invasive nature and high sensitivity and specificity make it a potential standalone diagnostic test for H. pylori infection. Moreover, the noteworthy negative correlation between the CLO test and esophageal ulcers provides evidence of the differing effects of H. pylori infection on antral-predominant and corpus-predominant gastritis.

Indexed as

Helicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriPeptic UlcerAdultAgedBreath TestsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSensitivity and SpecificityUlcerUreaYoung AdultImmunoglobulin GUrea

Identifiers

PMID38129568
PMCPMC10739736
OpenAlexW4390057575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.