ArticleScientific reports2023
Manually compressed soil blocks stabilised by fly ash based geopolymer: a promising approach for sustainable buildings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing sustainable cement free compositions with rice husk ash to improve mechanical performance in next generation ecoblocks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer cement mortar for non vibratory compacted trench backfilling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The construction industry is one of the sectors which have significant impacts on the environment. The research on sustainable materials is a demand of society. This paper presents an investigation on the use of fly ash (FA) geopolymer binder for the production of unburnt bricks. First, an optimisation process for the ratio of alkaline activator solution (AAS) and FA was performed. The blocks were obtained by compressing the materials in a mould by hand, similar to the traditional technique of the adobes. Different ratios of AAS in the blocks were investigated: 6%, 8%, 12% and 20% by mass, respectively. Two curing temperatures were tested: ambient temperature and at 60 °C. Then, different properties of the blocks were determined: flexural tensile strength, compressive strengths (in the quasi-dry state and in the saturated state), water absorption. The techniques of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) were also used for the analyses of the results obtained. The results showed that the blocks with 20% AAS had highest compressive strengths with an average of 24 MPa at 28 days, while the recommended AAS amount for both technical and economical points of view was 8%, with a mean compressive strength of 13 MPa at 28 days. The ratio between the saturated compressive strength on the quasi-dry compressive strength was higher than 0.5, which satisfied the current exigencies from the standards. These exploratory results are important for practice applications of this type of blocks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.