Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129505›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Prognostic value of normal levels of preoperative tumor markers in colorectal cancer.

Guangming Ren, Ruikai Li, Gaozan Zheng, Kunli Du, Hanjun Dan, Hongze Wu, Xinyu Dou, Lili Duan, Zhenyu Xie, Liaoran Niu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Guangming Ren *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ruikai Li *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Gaozan Zheng *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Kunli DuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Hanjun DanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Hongze WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xinyu DouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lili DuanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhenyu XieDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Liaoran NiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ye TianDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jianyong ZhengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China. zhjy68@163.com.
Fan FengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China. surgeonfengfan@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 82072655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) are widely used tumor markers for colorectal cancer (CRC), but their clinical significance is unknown when the levels of these tumor markers were within the normal range. This retrospective study included 2145 CRC patients. The entire cohort was randomly divided into training and validation datasets. The optimal cut-off values of tumor markers were calculated using X-tile software, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess its association with overall survival (OS). The nomogram model was constructed and validated. The entire cohort was randomly divided into a training dataset (1502 cases, 70%) and a validation dataset (643 cases,30%). Calculated from the training dataset, the optimal cut-off value was 2.9 ng/mL for CEA, 10.1 ng/mL for CA19-9, 13.4 U/mL for CA125, and 1.8 ng/mL for AFP, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, tumor location, T stage, N stage, preoperative CA19-9, and CA125 levels were independent prognostic predictors. Even within the normal range, CRC patients with relatively high levels of CA19-9 or CA125 worse OS compared to those with relatively low levels. Then, based on the independent prognostic predictors from multivariate analysis, two models with/without (model I/II) CA19-9 and CA125 were built, model I showed better prediction and reliability than model II. Within the normal range, relatively high levels of preoperative CA19-9 and CA125 were significantly associated with poor OS in CRC patients. The nomogram based on CA19-9 and CA125 levels showed improved predictive accuracy ability for CRC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal Neoplasmsalpha-FetoproteinsCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenHumansPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38129505
PMCPMC10739851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.