Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38129474›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Endophytic microbiota and ectomycorrhizal structure of Alnus glutinosa Gaertn. at saline and nonsaline forest sites.

Dominika Thiem, Marc Goebel, Marcin Gołębiewski, Christel Baum, Piotr Koczorski, Sonia Szymańska, Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The effects ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dominika ThiemDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Lwowska 1, 87-100, Torun, Poland. thiem@umk.pl.
Marc GoebelDepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, 111 Fernow Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Marcin GołębiewskiCentre of Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, NCU, Wilenska 4, 87-100, Torun, Poland.
Christel BaumSoil Science, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, 18059, Rostock, Germany.
Piotr KoczorskiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Lwowska 1, 87-100, Torun, Poland.
Sonia SzymańskaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Lwowska 1, 87-100, Torun, Poland.
Katarzyna HrynkiewiczDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Lwowska 1, 87-100, Torun, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLCollege of Social and Media Culture · PLCornell University · USUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

Narodowym Centrum Nauki PRELUDIUM 2016/23/N/NZ8/00294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tolerance of European alder (Alnus glutinosa Gaertn.) to soil salinity can be attributed to symbiosis with microorganisms at the absorptive root level. However, it is uncertain how soil salinity impacts microbial recruitment in the following growing season. We describe the bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere and endosphere of A. glutinosa absorptive roots at three tested sites with different salinity level. We determined the morphological diversity of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi, the endophytic microbiota in the rhizosphere, and the colonization of new absorptive roots in the following growing season. While bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere was higher than that in the absorptive root endosphere, the opposite was true for fungi. Actinomycetota, Frankiales, Acidothermus sp. and Streptomyces sp. were more abundant in the endosphere than in the rhizosphere, while Actinomycetota and Acidothermus sp. dominated at saline sites compared to nonsaline sites. Basidiomycota, Thelephorales, Russulales, Helotiales, Cortinarius spp. and Lactarius spp. dominated the endosphere, while Ascomycota, Hypocreales and Giberella spp. dominated the rhizosphere. The ECM symbioses formed by Thelephorales (Thelephora, Tomentella spp.) constituted the core community with absorptive roots in the spring and further colonized new root tips during the growing season. With an increase in soil salinity, the overall fungal abundance decreased, and Russula spp. and Cortinarius spp. were not present at all. Similarly, salinity also negatively affected the average length of the absorptive root. In conclusion, the endophytic microbiota in the rhizosphere of A. glutinosa was driven by salinity and season, while the ECM morphotype community was determined by the soil fungal community present during the growing season and renewed in the spring.

Indexed as

AlnusBasidiomycotaMicrobiotaMycorrhizaeBacteriaForestsPlant RootsSoilSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID38129474
PMCPMC10739818
OpenAlexW4390055142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.