ArticleScientific reports2023
Early diagnosis and meta-agnostic model visualization of tuberculosis based on radiography images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SPX-GNN: An Explainable Graph Neural Network for Harnessing Long-Range Dependencies in Tuberculosis Classifications in Chest X-Ray Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of a clinical prediction model for poor treatment outcomes in the intensive phase in patients with initial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Robust Tuberculosis Diagnosis Using Chest X-Rays Based on a Hybrid Vision Transformer and Principal Component Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite being treatable and preventable, tuberculosis (TB) affected one-fourth of the world population in 2019, and it took the lives of 1.4 million people in 2019. It affected 1.2 million children around the world in the same year. As it is an infectious bacterial disease, the early diagnosis of TB prevents further transmission and increases the survival rate of the affected person. One of the standard diagnosis methods is the sputum culture test. Diagnosing and rapid sputum test results usually take one to eight weeks in 24 h. Using posterior-anterior chest radiographs (CXR) facilitates a rapid and more cost-effective early diagnosis of tuberculosis. Due to intraclass variations and interclass similarities in the images, TB prognosis from CXR is difficult. We proposed an early TB diagnosis system (tbXpert) based on deep learning methods. Deep Fused Linear Triangulation (FLT) is considered for CXR images to reconcile intraclass variation and interclass similarities. To improve the robustness of the prognosis approach, deep information must be obtained from the minimal radiation and uneven quality CXR images. The advanced FLT method accurately visualizes the infected region in the CXR without segmentation. Deep fused images are trained by the Deep learning network (DLN) with residual connections. The largest standard database, comprised of 3500 TB CXR images and 3500 normal CXR images, is utilized for training and validating the recommended model. Specificity, sensitivity, Accuracy, and AUC are estimated to determine the performance of the proposed systems. The proposed system demonstrates a maximum testing accuracy of 99.2%, a sensitivity of 98.9%, a specificity of 99.6%, a precision of 99.6%, and an AUC of 99.4%, all of which are pretty high when compared to current state-of-the-art deep learning approaches for the prognosis of tuberculosis. To lessen the radiologist's time, effort, and reliance on the level of competence of the specialist, the suggested system named tbXpert can be deployed as a computer-aided diagnosis technique for tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.