Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2024
Telitacicept in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02885610 (A Phase IIb , Placebo-Controlled ,Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-explorating Trial of RC18,a Recombinant Human B Lymphocyte Stimulating Factor Receptor-Antibody Fusion Protein in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus), which is not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IIb , Placebo-Controlled ,Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-explorating Trial of RC18,a Recombinant Human B Lymphocyte Stimulating Factor Receptor-Antibody Fusion Protein in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarker-stratified efficacy and safety of biologics in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics and targeted small-molecule therapies plus stable background therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Telitacicept in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review of clinical outcomes, steroid-sparing effects, and safety.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Dual BAFF/APRIL inhibition with telitacicept in systemic lupus erythematosus and IgA nephropathy: pharmacological rationale, clinical efficacy, and safety on female fertility preservation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of telitacicept and belimumab on systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of different recommended doses of telitacicept in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Disease modification in lupus nephritis: towards a pathophysiology-based treatment paradigm.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Observation on the short-term efficacy of telitacicept in the treatment of primary IgA nephropathy.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Real-world effectiveness of telitacicept in ebv-seropositive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of telitacicept combined with standard of care in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a real-world retrospective study.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of telitacicept for rituximab-refractory membranous nephropathy.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- BAFF/APRIL-targeted therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- BAFF and APRIL Receptors in B Cell Immunity and Autoimmunity.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- Efficacy of telitacicept in a refractory systemic lupus erythematosus patient with lupus nephritis and subsequent pregnancy: a case-based review.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- Efficacy of telitacicept on renal outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis: a 12-month follow-up pilot study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Molecular characterisation of telitacicept response phenotypes in systemic lupus erythematosus: an exploratory integrated transcriptome and B-cell receptor repertoire profiling study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- From 'Me too' to 'Me better' and 'Me cooler': the recent rheumatology advances in China.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Review
- Tofacitinib versus BAFF inhibitor in mild to moderate systemic lupus erythematosus: a real-world study based on CSTAR cohort.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a novel fusion protein that neutralises signals of B lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation-inducing ligand, in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
methodsAdult patients with active SLE (n=249) were recruited from 29 hospitals in China and randomised 1:1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous telitacicept at 80 mg (n=62), 160 mg (n=63), 240 mg (n=62) or placebo (n=62) once weekly in addition to standard therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response at week 48. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward method.
resultsAt week 48, the proportion of patients achieving an SRI-4 response was 75.8% in the 240 mg telitacicept group, 68.3% in the 160 mg group, 71.0% in the 80 mg group and 33.9% in the placebo group (all p<0.001). Significant treatment responses were observed in secondary endpoints, including a ≥4-point reduction on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, a lack of Physician's Global Assessment score worsening and a glucocorticoid dose reduction in the 240 mg group. Telitacicept was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was similar between the telitacicept and placebo groups.
conclusionsThis phase 2b clinical trial met the primary endpoint. All telitacicept groups showed a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving an SRI-4 response than the placebo group at week 48, and all doses were well tolerated. These results support further investigations of telitacicept in clinical trials involving more diverse populations and larger sample sizes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02885610).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.