ArticleJournal of environmental quality
A short history of the phosphorus index and Andrew Sharpley's contributions from inception through development and implementation.
Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A short history of the phosphorus index and Andrew Sharpley's contributions from inception through development and implementation.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
- Balancing agriculture and environment: Andrew Sharpley's nutrient, soil, and water management legacy.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
- The importance of consensus science to managing phosphorus in the environment: SERA-17 and the legacy of Andrew Sharpley.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
- A review of the development and implementation of the critical source area concept: A reflection of Andrew Sharpley's role in improving water quality.Journal of environmental qualityReview
- Phosphorus lability across diverse agricultural contexts with legacy sources.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
- Evaluation of Minnesota Phosphorus Loss Index performance.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
- Through the lens of phosphorus: The legacy of Andrew Sharpley.Journal of environmental qualityReview
- Testing Wisconsin P index assessments across cropping systems.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
- Evaluation of Alabama phosphorus index using edge-of-field monitoring data.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
- Targeting phosphorus loss with carbon farming practices? Results from an on-farm study.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the 1980s, growing recognition of agricultural phosphorus (P) sources to surface water eutrophication led to scrutiny of animal feeding operations. In 1990, the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) invited prominent scientists to find a solution. It was at an initial meeting that Dr. Andrew Sharpley suggested that P assessment could be modeled after the Universal Soil Loss Equation, where a matrix of factors influencing P loss would be associated with farm nutrient management recommendations. After codifying the P assessment into the USDA-NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Standard some 10 years later, 48 states chose to develop their own P Index. Sharpley, working with many others, helped develop several state P Indices. In 2000, Sharpley secured funding from the USDA-Agricultural Research Service to support the National P Research Project, which conducted in-field P runoff assessments using standardized rainfall simulated studies across 20 states; this allowed individual trials to be aggregated for agroecological regions that were then incorporated into specific state P Indices. Eventually, comparison of P Indices across state boundaries led to a white paper at the behest of USDA-NRCS that resulted in three regional projects evaluating modeling approaches to support or replace P Indices. Sharpley's national umbrella project pointed to shortcomings in water quality models, such as APEX or TBET, as a replacement for state P Indices, which remain a key part of the USDA-590 standard. As a selfless leader, capable of attracting and assembling diverse, productive interdisciplinary teams, Sharpley was essential to the inception, development, and implementation of the P Index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.