Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38128917›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental quality

A short history of the phosphorus index and Andrew Sharpley's contributions from inception through development and implementation.

Deanna L Osmond, Peter J A Kleinman, Frank Coale, Nathan O Nelson, Carl H Bolster, Josh McGrath

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deanna L OsmondDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-8318
Peter J A KleinmanSoil Management and Sugarbeet Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-3736
Frank CoaleCollege of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Nathan O NelsonDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-1009
Carl H BolsterUSDA-ARS, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6646-0921
Josh McGrathOCP North America, Wayzata, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-8795

Funding

Natural Resources Conservation Service NR203A7500010C00C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 1980s, growing recognition of agricultural phosphorus (P) sources to surface water eutrophication led to scrutiny of animal feeding operations. In 1990, the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) invited prominent scientists to find a solution. It was at an initial meeting that Dr. Andrew Sharpley suggested that P assessment could be modeled after the Universal Soil Loss Equation, where a matrix of factors influencing P loss would be associated with farm nutrient management recommendations. After codifying the P assessment into the USDA-NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Standard some 10 years later, 48 states chose to develop their own P Index. Sharpley, working with many others, helped develop several state P Indices. In 2000, Sharpley secured funding from the USDA-Agricultural Research Service to support the National P Research Project, which conducted in-field P runoff assessments using standardized rainfall simulated studies across 20 states; this allowed individual trials to be aggregated for agroecological regions that were then incorporated into specific state P Indices. Eventually, comparison of P Indices across state boundaries led to a white paper at the behest of USDA-NRCS that resulted in three regional projects evaluating modeling approaches to support or replace P Indices. Sharpley's national umbrella project pointed to shortcomings in water quality models, such as APEX or TBET, as a replacement for state P Indices, which remain a key part of the USDA-590 standard. As a selfless leader, capable of attracting and assembling diverse, productive interdisciplinary teams, Sharpley was essential to the inception, development, and implementation of the P Index.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPhosphorusAgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyUnited StatesUnited States Department of AgriculturePhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID38128917
PMCPMC12265852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.