Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38128649›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2024

Mobile treatment for opioid use disorder: Implementation of community-based, same-day medication access interventions.

Avik Chatterjee, Trevor Baker, Maria Rudorf, Galya Walt, Caroline Stotz, Anna Martin, Elizabeth N Kinnard, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Julie Bosak, Bethany Medley and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mobile addiction treatment units: a narrative review.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Avik ChatterjeeBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: avik.chatterjee@bmc.org.
Trevor BakerBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Maria RudorfBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Galya WaltBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Caroline StotzBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Anna MartinBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Elizabeth N KinnardBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Ann Scheck McAlearneyThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Julie BosakBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Bethany MedleyColumbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States of America.
Allyson PinkhoverBrockton Neighborhood Health Center, Brockton, MA, United States of America; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Jessica L TaylorBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Jeffrey H SametBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Karsten LunzeBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Boston Medical Center · USBoston University · USColumbia University · USJohns Hopkins University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

MassHEAL - Reducing overdose deaths by 40% (2019-2023)UM1DA049412 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAMET, JEFFREY H. · 2019 to 2023
$82.9M
CHASE: An Innovative County-Level Public Health Response to the Opioid Epidemic in New York StateUM1DA049415 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI EL-BASSEL, NABILA, GILBERT, LOUISA · 2019 to 2023
$77.3M
Optimizing HEALing in Ohio Communities (OHiO)-Health Equity SupplementUM1DA049417 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FREISTHLER, BRIDGET J, WINHUSEN, T JOHN · 2019 to 2023
$66.3M
NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049412NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049415NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) are lifesaving, but <20 % of individuals in the US who could benefit receive them. As part of the NIH-supported HEALing Communities Study (HCS), coalitions in several communities in Massachusetts and Ohio implemented mobile MOUD programs to overcome barriers to MOUD receipt. We defined mobile MOUD programs as units that provide same-day access to MOUD at remote sites. We aimed to (1) document the design and organizational structure of mobile programs providing same-day or next-day MOUD, and (2) explore the barriers and facilitators to implementation as well as the successes and challenges of ongoing operation.

methodsProgram staff from five programs in two states (n = 11) participated in semi-structured interviews. Two authors conducted thematic analysis of the transcripts based on the domains of the social-ecological model and the semi-structured interview guide.

resultsMobile MOUD units sought to improve immediate access to MOUD ("Our answer is pretty much always, 'Yes, we'll get you started right here, right now,'"), advance equity ("making sure that we have staff who speak other languages, who are on the unit and have some resources that are in different languages,"), and decrease opioid overdose deaths. Salient program characteristics included diverse staff, including staff with lived experience of substance use ("She just had that personal knowledge of where we should be going"). Mobile units offered harm reduction services, broad medical services (in particular, wound care), and connection to transportation programs and incorporated consistency in service provision and telemedicine access. Implementation facilitators included trusting relationships with partner organizations (particularly pharmacies and correctional facilities), nuanced understanding of local politics, advertising, protocol flexibility, and on-unit prescriber hours. Barriers included unclear licensing requirements, staffing shortages and competing priorities for staff, funding challenges due to inconsistency in grant funding and low reimbursement ("It's not really possible that billing in and of itself is going to be able to sustain it"), and community stigma toward addiction services generally.

conclusionsDespite organizational, community, and policy barriers, participants described mobile MOUD units as an innovative way to expand access to life-saving medications, promote equity in MOUD treatment, and overcome stigma.

Indexed as

Opiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAdvertisingFemaleHarm ReductionHumansKnowledgeHarm reductionMobile health unitsOpiate overdoseOpioid use disorderVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID38128649
PMCPMC10947870
OpenAlexW4389942517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.