ArticleAnnals of nutrition & metabolism2024
Early Famine Exposure Results in Left Ventricular Remodeled, Diastolic Dysfunction and Systolic Function Preserved in Adults.
Article in Annals of nutrition & metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMalnutrition during a critical window of development in a fetus or infant can result in abnormal cardiac remodeling and function. It is uncertain whether the contribution of these effects continues to impact the cardiac remodeling and function of adults over the course of several decades of growth. Our study examined the impact of early Chinese famine exposure on cardiac remodeling, left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, and LV systolic function in adults.
methodsParticipants at high risk of cardiovascular disease from the China Patient-Centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events Million Persons Project (PEACE MPP) were enrolled. The famine in China lasted from 1959 to 1962. A total of three groups were formed based on the participants' birth dates: pre-famine group, famine exposure group, and post-famine group. Logistic regression and linear mixed models were used to explore the association between famine exposure and cardiac remodeling, LV diastolic function and LV systolic function in adults.
resultsThe study included 2,758 participants, the mean age was 57.05 years, 62.8% were female, 26.4% had LV hypertrophy (LVH), 59.6% had LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), and 10.5% had reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS). Compared to post-famine exposure, participants had independently increased risk of LVH in the famine exposure group (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.60-2.56) and pre-famine exposure (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06-1.76). Compared to post-famine exposure, the risk of LVDD remarkably increased in the famine exposure group (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 2.49-3.71) and pre-famine exposure group (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.52-2.31). Famine exposure had no significant impact on GLS but was associated with a significant increase in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). Significant interactions were observed between the effects of famine exposure and other clinical/sociodemographic variables (gender, systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg or not, high school or above or not, and annual income <50,000 RMB or not) on these outcomes.
conclusionExposure to famine, particularly during fetal and infant stages, increases the risk of LVH and LVDD in adults. However, the LV systolic function remains preserved. These impacts are more pronounced in females, individuals with SBP ≥140 mm Hg, those with low income, or those with high educational status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.