ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
Variant of the terrible triad of the elbow, a CASE report with a review of the literature.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe terrible triad described by Hotchkiss in 1996 is a complex lesion of the elbow, following a trauma combining forced valgus and external rotation. It is a lesion that puts the elbow at risk of developing complications such as instability, stiffness, or synostosis of the proximal radio-cubital joint. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient who suffered a closed trauma to the right elbow following a fall onto the palm of the hand with a valgus lateral rotation mechanism. The lesion assessment showed a B2 fracture of the distal humerus (AO classification) with a line splitting the capitulum in the frontal plane, a type 3 coronoid process fracture (Morrey/Odriscoll classification), and a posterolateral elbow dislocation. The surgical treatment followed the same principles as for the terrible triad, with a reconstruction of the lateral column by osteosynthesis of the humeral palate, followed by an internal approach for osteosynthesis of the coronoid process, with the restoration of a stable elbow without laxity in the frontal plane. DISCUSSION: On the basis of the lesion mechanism, column theory, and the schematization of the constituent elements of elbow stability in a ring, certain lesions can be placed in the same box as the terrible triad of the elbow, which also complies with the same therapeutic implications.
conclusionOur observation underlines the possibility of the existence of lesions other than those described by Hotchkiss, which would have the same consequences: an unstable elbow with the risk of evolving into chronic instability or stiffness and whose management accepts the same management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.