ArticlePloS one2023
Biomechanical performance of resin composite on dental tissue restoration: A finite element analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Comparison of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties of Different Universal-Shade Resin Composites After Simulated Aging.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Iterative finite element analysis of molar uprighting using superelastic Nickel Titanium spring: introducing an Element-Iteration-Specific (EIS) material model.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- In silico analysis of stress distribution in ultra-translucent multilayered zirconia veneers of varying thickness and yttria content using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Review
- The influence of dental cavity on biomechanical stress and strain distribution: A finite element analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Effect of deep margin elevation and cavity configuration on the mechanical behavior of endocrown restorations: a 3D finite element study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Internal and Marginal Shrinkage Stress in Adhesive Class III Cavities Restored with Different Resin Composite Combinations-A 3D-FEA Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Stress Distribution on Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored via Different Ceramic Materials with Varying Post Lengths Versus Endocrown-A 3D Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Advances of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles in Dental Implant Applications.International dental journal · 2025Review
- How to adaptively balance 'classic' or 'conservative' approaches in tooth defect management: a 3D-finite element analysis study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Various Cavosurface Margins in Class II Restorations Using 3D Finite Element Method.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Hydroxyapatite Dental Inserts for Tooth Restoration: Stress and Displacement Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Biomechanical analysis of porous and dense dental implant-supported bridges in healthy and osteoporotic bones.PloS one · 2025Article
- Equivalence study of the resin-dentine interface of internal tunnel restorations when using an enamel infiltrant resin with ethanol-wet dentine bonding.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dental biomaterials redefined: molecular docking and dynamics-driven dental resin composite optimization.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the biomechanical performance of various dental materials when filled in different cavity designs and their effects on surrounding dental tissues. Finite element models of three infected teeth with different cavity designs, Class I (occlusal), Class II mesial-occlusal (MO), and Class II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) were constructed. These cavities were filled with amalgam, composites (Young's moduli of 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26 GPa), and glass carbomer cement (GCC). An occlusal load of 600 N was distributed on the top surface of the teeth to carry out simulations. The findings revealed that von Mises stress was higher in GCC material, with cavity Class I (46.01 MPa in the enamel, 23.61 MPa in the dentin), and for cavity Class II MO von Mises stress was 43.64 MPa, 39.18 MPa in enamel and dentin respectively, while in case of cavity Class II MOD von Mises stress was 44.67 MPa in enamel, 27.5 in the dentin. The results showed that higher stresses were generated in the non-restored tooth compared to the restored one, and increasing Young's modulus of restorative composite material decreases stresses in enamel and dentin. The use of composite material showed excellent performance which can be a good viable option for restorative material compared to other restorative materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.