Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38128022›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2024

Regional differences in clinical phenotype of axial spondyloarthritis: results from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS).

Denis Poddubnyy, Fernando Sommerfleck, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Christine Bundy, Souzi Makri, Shashank Akerkar, Lillann Wermskog, Elie Karam, José Correa-Fernández, Asif Siddiqui and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Spondyloarthritis in Latin America: a difficult-to-diagnose challenge.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Denis PoddubnyyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4537-6015
Fernando SommerfleckRheumatology Department, Sanatorio Julio Mendez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Victoria Navarro-CompánRheumatology Department, IdiPaz, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4527-852X
Christine BundyRheumatology Department, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Souzi MakriPatient Advocacy, Cyprus League for People with Rheumatism (CYLPER), Nicosia, Cyprus.
Shashank AkerkarRheumatology Department, Mumbai Arthritis Clinic, Mumbai, India.
Lillann WermskogPatient Advocacy, Spondyloarthritis Association of Norway (SPAFO), Oslo, Norway.
Elie KaramPatient Advocacy, Canadian Spondylitis Association (CSA), Toronto, Canada.
José Correa-FernándezHealth & Territory Research (HTR), Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Asif SiddiquiPatient Engagement, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Marco Garrido-CumbreraHealth & Territory Research (HTR), Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-1189
Universidad de Sevilla · ESCardiff University · GBGerman Rheumatism Research Centre · DEHospital Universitario La Paz · ESMultiple Sclerosis International Federation · GBNovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

International Map of Axial SpondyloarthritisNovartis Pharma AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore differences in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) clinical phenotype around the world in a large sample of patients included in the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS).

methodIMAS was a cross-sectional online survey (2017-2022) of 5557 unselected axSpA patients from 27 countries. We analysed across five geographic regions the age at symptom onset, diagnostic delay, gender, HLA-B27, family history, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations, presence of comorbidities, disease activity (BASDAI), level of spinal stiffness and treatments.

resultsOf 5557 IMAS participants, 3493 were from Europe, 770 from North America, 600 from Asia, 548 from Latin America and 146 from South Africa. Age at symptom onset ranged between 25 and 30 years and was higher in Latin America. Diagnostic delay was longest in South Africa and lowest in Asia. The lowest HLA-B27 positivity was observed in Latin America and the highest in Asia. Extra-musculoskeletal manifestations were the lowest in Europe. Mean disease activity (BASDAI) was 5.4, with highest values in South Africa and lowest in Asia. Most of the patients had used NSAIDs for their condition and less than half had ever taken conventional synthetic DMARDS; both were more frequent in Latin America and South Africa. Almost half of the patients had ever taken biologic DMARDs, more frequent use being in the Americas.

conclusionThere is great heterogeneity of axSpA clinical phenotype presentation around the world. AxSpA manifests differently in different regions, so further understanding of these differences of phenotypes is needed to achieve early diagnosis and initiation of optimal disease treatment in axSpA in the different regions.

Indexed as

Axial SpondyloarthritisDelayed DiagnosisPhenotypeAdultAge of OnsetAntirheumatic AgentsAsiaCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHLA-B27 AntigenHumansLatin AmericaMaleMiddle AgedNorth AmericaAntirheumatic AgentsHLA-B27 AntigenAxial spondyloarthritisdiagnosticphenotyperegional differences

Identifiers

PMID38128022
PMCPMC11371368
OpenAlexW4390046274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.