ArticlePloS one2023
Extent of integration of nutrition assessment counselling and support interventions in the health system and respective drivers: A case of Tororo district, Uganda.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translating the strategy of integrating comprehensive nutrition assessment, counselling, and support into action using a grounded theory approach in Tororo district, Uganda.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUganda embraced Nutrition Assessment Counselling and Support (NACS) since 2009 as a health system strengthening approach to improve health and nutrition outcomes. However, scant evidence exists on NACS integration and drivers. This study therefore assessed the extent of NACS integration in the health system and identified key drivers and barriers.
methodsA mixed method design was employed. In a facilitated panel discussions at each of the 17 health facilities, 4-5 health staff participated, responding to a semi-structured questionnaire. Integration was assessed on a 5-point scoring scale of 1 for not done nor integrated, 2-4 for partial and 5 for fully integration. Data was captured, analysed in microsoft excel and presented using as bar and spider charts. Integration drivers were identified deductively from key informant and in-depth interviews using Atlas.ti 9 and thematic analysis.
resultsThe NACS integration across the health facility level was partial at a score of 2.9 indicating a weak integration into the health system. Integration across the health system building blocks was partial at; service delivery (3.8), health work force (3.7), health information (3.3), community support system (3.0), governance and leadership (3.0) signifying that NACS activities are provided by Ministry of Health but sub-optimal due to weak capacities. Health financing (2.2) and Health supplies (1.5) were the least integrated due to partner dependence. Under service delivery, deworming (5) was fully integrated and provided by Ministry of Health. The key drivers for integration were; good leadership, financing, competent staff, quality improvement approaches, nutrition talks, community dialogues, nutrition logistics and supplies.
conclusionThe NACS integration in the health system was generally low and lacked adequate support. Governance, financing and community follow-up under service delivery require more government investment for enhanced integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.