Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38127994›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2024

Risk of adverse birth outcomes after adolescent and young adult cancer.

Chelsea Anderson, Christopher D Baggett, Stephanie M Engel, Darios Getahun, Nancy T Cannizzaro, Sara Mitra, Clare Meernik, Lisa M Moy, Cecile A Laurent, Xi Zhou and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea AndersonCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6535-481X
Christopher D BaggettDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stephanie M EngelDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Darios GetahunDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Nancy T CannizzaroDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Sara MitraLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0721-1375
Clare MeernikDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8564-1266
Lisa M MoyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Cecile A LaurentDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Xi ZhouLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lanfang XuMedHealth Statistical Consulting Inc, Solon, OH, USA.
Marilyn L KwanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
William A WoodLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Barbara LukeDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-8133
Chun R ChaoDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Lawrence H KushiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Hazel B NicholsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Hazel B Nichols · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
Preclinical CoreP50HD103573 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GABRIEL S DICHTER · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes in Adolescent and Young Adult Female Cancer SurvivorsR01CA204258 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLS, HAZEL B · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204258NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103573NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany women diagnosed with cancer as adolescents and young adults (AYAs, age 15-39 years) want biological children after cancer but lack information on the potential impact of their cancer history on future reproductive outcomes. We investigated the risk of adverse birth outcomes among AYA cancer survivors.

methodsWe identified insured women diagnosed with AYA breast cancer, thyroid cancer, gynecologic cancers, lymphoma, or melanoma from 2003 to 2016 in the state of North Carolina or the Kaiser Permanente health care systems in northern and southern California. Post-diagnosis births to cancer survivors were each matched with up to 5 births to women without cancer. Risk ratios for preterm birth (<37 completed weeks), very preterm birth (<34 completed weeks), low birth weight (<2500 g), and small for gestational age (SGA, <10th percentile of weight for gestational age) were estimated using modified Poisson regression.

resultsAnalyses included 1648 births to 1268 AYA cancer survivors and 7879 births to 6066 women without cancer. Overall, risk of preterm birth, very preterm birth, low birth weight, and SGA did not significantly differ between births to women with and without cancer. However, births to women with gynecologic cancers had a significantly increased risk of low birth weight (risk ratio = 1.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 3.21) and suggested increased risk of preterm birth (risk ratio = 1.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.99 to 2.54). Chemotherapy exposure was not associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes.

conclusionsWomen with gynecologic cancers, but not other cancers, had an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes compared to women without cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsPregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38127994
PMCPMC10868397
OpenAlexW4390043753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.