Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38127980›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Radiation and temperature drive diurnal variation of aerobic methane emissions from Scots pine canopy.

Lukas Kohl, Salla A M Tenhovirta, Markku Koskinen, Anuliina Putkinen, Iikka Haikarainen, Tatu Polvinen, Luca Galeotti, Ivan Mammarella, Henri M P Siljanen, Thomas Matthew Robson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The 'photosynthetic CCommunications biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiation and temperature drive diurnal variation of aerobic methane emissions from Scots pine canopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lukas KohlDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5902-9444
Salla A M TenhovirtaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5600-6274
Markku KoskinenDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9473-6064
Anuliina PutkinenDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Iikka HaikarainenDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Tatu PolvinenDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Luca GaleottiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Ivan MammarellaInstitute for Atmosphere and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00560, Finland.
Henri M P SiljanenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio 70600, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3197-1438
Thomas Matthew RobsonNational School of Forestry, University of Cumbria, Ambleside LA22 9BB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-796X
Bartosz AdamczykNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Mari PihlatieDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6035-3949

Funding

Academy of Finland (AKA) 2884941Academy of Finland (AKA) 319329Academy of Finland (AKA) 339489Academy of Finland (AKA) 354501EC | European Research Council (ERC) 757695EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020) 843511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methane emissions from plant foliage may play an important role in the global methane cycle, but their size and the underlying source processes remain poorly understood. Here, we quantify methane fluxes from the shoots of Scots pine trees, a dominant tree species in boreal forests, to identify source processes and environmental drivers, and we evaluate whether these fluxes can be constrained at the ecosystem-level by eddy covariance flux measurements. We show that shoot-level measurements conducted in forest, garden, or greenhouse settings; on mature trees and saplings; manually and with an automated CO

Indexed as

EcosystemPinus sylvestrisCarbon DioxideForestsMethaneSoilTemperatureTreesCarbon DioxideMethaneSoilaerobic methane productiondiurnal cycleScots pine

Identifiers

PMID38127980
PMCPMC10756279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.