Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38127934›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Exploring COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in Zimbabwe: A mixed methods study.

Tinotenda Taruvinga, Rudo S Chingono, Edson Marambire, Leyla Larsson, Ioana D Olaru, Sibusisiwe Sibanda, Farirai Nzvere, Nicole Redzo, Chiratidzo E Ndhlovu, Simbarashe Rusakaniko and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Tinotenda TaruvingaThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4392-8525
Rudo S ChingonoThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-7861
Edson MarambireThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5944-5010
Leyla LarssonThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-4630
Ioana D OlaruThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sibusisiwe SibandaThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Farirai NzvereThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3260-6889
Nicole RedzoThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Chiratidzo E NdhlovuInternal Medicine Unit, University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Simbarashe RusakanikoDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3159-0205
Hilda MujuruDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1615-3856
Edwin SibandaBulawayo City Council Health Department, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Prosper ChonziHarare City Council Health Department, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Maphios SiamuchembuMinistry of Health and Child Care, Provincial Medical Directorate, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Rudo ChikodzoreMinistry of Health and Child Care, Department of Epidemiology and Diseases Control, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Agnes MahomvaNational Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Office of the President, and Cabinet, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Rashida A FerrandThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7660-9176
Justin DixonThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Katharina KranzerThe Health Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5691-7270
Biomedical Research and Training Institute · ZWLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBLMU Klinikum · DEUniversity of Zimbabwe · ZWMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWCabinet Office · JP

Funding

Training for Research Excellence and MeNtorship in Tuberculosis (TRENT)D43TW009539 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI METCALFE, JOHN ZAPATA · 2013 to 2022
$2.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009539Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With COVID-19 no longer categorized as a public health emergency of international concern, vaccination strategies and priority groups for vaccination have evolved. Africa Centres for Diseases Prevention and Control proposed the '100-100-70%' strategy which aims to vaccinate all healthcare workers, all vulnerable groups, and 70% of the general population. Understanding whether healthcare workers were reached during previous vaccination campaigns and what can be done to address concerns, anxieties, and other influences on vaccine uptake, will be important to optimally plan how to achieve these ambitious targets. In this mixed-methods study, between June 2021 and July 2022 a quantitative survey was conducted with healthcare workers accessing a comprehensive health check in Zimbabwe to determine whether and, if so, when they had received a COVID-19 vaccine. Healthcare workers were categorized as those who had received the vaccine 'early' (before 30.06.2021) and those who had received it 'late' (after 30.06.2021). In addition, 17 in-depth interviews were conducted to understand perceptions and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Of the 3,086 healthcare workers employed at 43 facilities who participated in the study, 2,986 (97%, 95% CI [92%-100%]) reported that they had received at least one vaccine dose. Geographical location, older age, higher educational attainment and having a chronic condition was associated with receiving the vaccine early. Qualitatively, (mis)information, infection risk perception, quasi-mandatory vaccination requirements, and legitimate concerns such as safety and efficacy influenced vaccine uptake. Meeting the proposed 100-100-70 target entails continued emphasis on strong communication while engaging meaningfully with healthcare workers' concerns. Mandatory vaccination may undermine trust and should not be a substitute for sustained engagement.

Identifiers

PMID38127934
PMCPMC10734954
OpenAlexW4390062521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.