Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38127564›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2023

The patient experience of skill mix changes in primary care: an in-depth study of patient 'work' when accessing primary care.

Elizabeth Dalgarno, Imelda McDermott, Mhorag Goff, Sharon Spooner, Anne McBride, Damian Hodgson, Ailsa Donnelly, Judith Hogg, Kath Checkland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. What patients want from access to UK general practice: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth DalgarnoDepartment of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-6268
Imelda McDermottHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Mhorag GoffHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Sharon SpoonerHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Anne McBrideInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Damian HodgsonThe University of Sheffield, Management School, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JA, UK.
Ailsa DonnellyThe patient and public involvement and engagement group at The Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research (Primer), The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Judith HoggThe patient and public involvement and engagement group at The Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research (Primer), The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Kath ChecklandHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper presents insights into patient experiences of changes in workforce composition due to increasing deployment in general practice of practitioners from a number of different professional disciplines (skill mix). We explore these experiences via the concept of 'patient illness work'; how a patient's capacity for action is linked to the work arising from healthcare.

methodsWe conducted four focus group interviews with Patient Participation Group members across participating English general practitioner practices. Thematic analysis and a theoretical lens of illness work were used to explore patients' attempts to understand and navigate new structures, roles and ways to access healthcare.

resultsParticipants' lack of knowledge about incoming practitioners constrained their agency in accessing primary care. They reported both increased and burdensome illness work as they were given responsibility for navigating and understanding new systems of access while simultaneously understanding new practitioner roles.

conclusionsWhile skill mix changes were not resisted by patients, they were keen to improve their agency in capacity to access, by being better informed about newer practitioners to accept and trust them. Some patients require support to navigate change, especially where new systems demand specific capacities such as technological skills and adaptation to unfamiliar practitioners.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentPrimary Health CareHealth servicesOlder peoplePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID38127564
PMCPMC10734673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.