Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38127536›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2024

Emotion and anxiety interact to bias spatial attention.

Helena P Bachmann, Shruti Japee, Elisha P Merriam, Tina T Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helena P BachmannComputational Neuroimaging and Perception Group, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health.ORCID 0000-0002-1730-3839
Shruti JapeeSection on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-5017
Elisha P MerriamComputational Neuroimaging and Perception Group, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-566X
Tina T LiuComputational Neuroimaging and Perception Group, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health.ORCID 0000-0003-0316-5356

Funding

Multiple Scales of Stimulus Representation in the Human BrainZIAMH002966 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MERRIAM, ELISHA · 2017 to 2025
$10.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002966National Institute of Mental Health; Intramural Research Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional expressions are an evolutionarily conserved means of social communication essential for social interactions. It is important to understand how anxious individuals perceive their social environments, including emotional expressions, especially with the rising prevalence of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anxiety is often associated with an attentional bias for threat-related stimuli, such as angry faces. Yet the mechanisms by which anxiety enhances or impairs two key components of spatial attention-attentional capture and attentional disengagement-to emotional expressions are still unclear. Moreover, positive valence is often ignored in studies of threat-related attention and anxiety, despite the high occurrence of happy faces during everyday social interaction. Here, we investigated the relationship between anxiety, emotional valence, and spatial attention in 574 participants across two preregistered studies (data collected in 2021 and 2022; Experiment 1:

Indexed as

AnxietyEmotionsFacial ExpressionAdultAngerAttentionAttentional BiasCOVID-19FemaleHappinessHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpace PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38127536
PMCPMC11116080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.