Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38127494›Full record

Observational studyJournal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)2024

Couples communication and cancer: Sequences and trajectories of behavioral affective processes in relation to intimacy.

Karena Leo, Shelby L Langer, Laura S Porter, Katherine Ramos, Joan M Romano, Donald H Baucom, Brian R W Baucom

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karena LeoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-6025-6495
Shelby L LangerCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University.ORCID 0000-0002-6034-1830
Laura S PorterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-2962-2378
Katherine RamosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-7584-3040
Joan M RomanoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-0041-9736
Donald H BaucomDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0003-4287-4155
Brian R W BaucomDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-0263-3763

Funding

Couple Communication in Cancer: A Multi-Method Examination - Renewal - 1R01CA201179 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Shelby Langer, LAURA S PORTER · 2016 to 2026
$7.2M
A Patient-Caregiver Behavioral Intervention for Older Adults with Cancer and Mild Cognitive ImpairmentK08CA258947 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine Ramos · 2022 to 2026
$809k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA258947NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer poses a set of physical and emotional challenges to the patient, spouse, and their relationship. One challenge for couples is discussing cancer-related concerns in a manner that facilitates intimacy. Current couple-based interventions have been shown to have mixed efficacy, and little is known about how they bring about improvements. This study aims to expand our understanding of dyadic communication and intimacy to adapt and/or develop more effective interventions for couples coping with cancer. To accomplish this goal, the present study examined affective and behavioral processes associated with intimacy using the valence-affective-connection (VAC) framework and observational coding methods. Participants were 134 couples in which a patient was diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. Couples completed a battery of questionnaires, including a self-report measure of intimacy. Couples also completed a 15-min videotaped interaction about a cancer topic of their choosing, which was observationally coded for communication behavior and affective expression. Couples coping with cancer who reported higher versus lower intimacy engaged in qualitatively different levels, types, and patterns of communication behavior and affective expression. Specifically, couples who reported lower relationship intimacy used negative approach behavior and hard negative affect more frequently and for longer periods of time and were more likely to use avoidance-based communication. Higher intimacy couples were less likely to sustain the use of negative behavior and affect and displayed more reciprocity of positive joining affect. The study highlights important considerations for couple-based interventions and research in the context of cancer. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalNeoplasmsCommunicationHumansInterpersonal RelationsSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID38127494
PMCPMC11164418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.