Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38127271›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2024

Advanced practice providers in hematology: actionable findings from national paired APP and physician surveys.

Ariela L Marshall, Leah E Masselink, Peter A Kouides, Faith E Davies, Azam Farooqui, Srikanth Nagalla, Alex Herrera, Nicole Mortier, Robert Brodsky, Clese E Erikson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hematology-Oncology Fellows' Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Multicenter Educational Practice and Needs Assessment Survey.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ariela L MarshallDivision of Hematology Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-7388-0422
Leah E MasselinkFitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Peter A KouidesUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3857-8313
Faith E DaviesPearlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Azam FarooquiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers, Chandler, AZ.
Srikanth NagallaDivision of Hematology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL.
Alex HerreraDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9665-7415
Nicole MortierSickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials Network, ASH Research Collaborative, Washington, DC.
Robert BrodskyDivision of Hematology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-1255
Clese E EriksonFitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0003-1531-9535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAdvanced practice providers (APPs) are critical to the hematology workforce. However, there is limited knowledge about APPs in hematology regarding specialty-specific training, scope of practice, challenges and opportunities in APP-physician interactions, and involvement with the American Society of Hematology (ASH). We conducted APP and physician focus groups to elucidate major themes in these areas and used results to inform development of 2 national surveys, 1 for APPs and 1 for physicians who work with APPs. The APP survey was distributed to members of the Advanced Practitioner Society of Hematology and Oncology, and the physician survey was distributed to physician members of ASH. A total of 841 APPs and 1334 physicians completed the surveys. APPs reported most hematology-specific knowledge was obtained via on-the-job training and felt additional APP-focused training would be helpful (as did physicians). Nearly all APPs and physicians agreed that APPs were an integral part of their organizations and that physician-APP collaborations were generally positive. A total of 42.1% of APPs and 29.3% of physicians reported burnout, and >50% of physicians felt that working with APPs had reduced their burnout. Both physicians and APPs reported interest in additional resources including "best practice" guidelines for APP-physician collaboration, APP access to hematology educational resources (both existing and newly developed resources for physicians and trainees), and greater APP integration into national specialty-specific professional organizations including APP-focused sessions at conferences. Professional organizations such as ASH are well positioned to address these areas.

Indexed as

HematologyPhysiciansFocus GroupsHumansMedical OncologyWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID38127271
PMCPMC10910059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.