ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2024
[Continuation of implementation processes in residential long-term care : Sustainability of the expert standard "Relationship management in the care of people with dementia"].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing institutions are facing many challenges due to evidence-based requirements. For example, they are required to introduce new interventions such as expert standards and thus adapt routine practices to new findings; however, if new interventions are continuously implemented in the facilities their sustainability is questionable.
objectiveThe aim was to find out how sustainably the expert standard "Relationship management in the care of people with dementia" is implemented in residential long-term care institutions. MATERIAL AND
methodsQualitative, guideline-based interviews were conducted with persons from residential long-term care, oriented to the procedure of the problem-centered interview. The interviewees were involved in the model implementation of the expert standard "Relationship management in the care of people with dementia"'. The data were then analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsThe participants assessed the sustainable implementation in different ways. Some rated the sustainability of the expert standard in their institution as successful, while others see potential for improvement. According to the participants, the sustainability of continuation of implementation processes is influenced by various factors. These relate to the institution, the external context, the intervention, the implementation process, and the people involved in the implementation.
conclusionOn the basis of the factors identified, key needs can be derived for nursing practice, for science and research as well as for politics and legislation, so that the sustainability of expert standards and other evidence-based interventions can be ensured and, if necessary, optimized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.