Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38127133›Full record

ReviewLung2024

The Therapeutic Landscape in Chronic Cough.

Jaclyn A Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Camlipixant in Refractory Chronic Cough: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial (SOOTHE).American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Research Progress on Upper Airway Cough Syndrome.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  8. Endogenous forms of ATP-ATPProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Investigation of the Pathomechanism of Chronic Cough Using an In Vitro Approach.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chronic cough as a disease.ERJ open research · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaclyn A SmithDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK. jacky.smith@manchester.ac.uk.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in the development of antitussive therapies and the first new therapy, gefapixant has been licenced in Europe. This review describes current unlicenced treatments for chronic cough and details treatments currently in development for refractory chronic cough and cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, as well as compounds previously explored.

Indexed as

Antitussive AgentsChronic CoughChronic DiseaseCoughEuropeHumansAntitussive AgentsAntitussivesIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisP2X3 antagonistsRefractory chronic cough

Identifiers

PMID38127133
PMCPMC10896934
OpenAlexW4390061560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.