ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Lung ultrasound for the sick child: less harm and more information than a radiograph.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Pediatric lung ultrasound: Tips and tricks for better scanning and interpretation.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the relationship between lung ultrasound findings and degree of obstruction in newly diagnosed pediatric asthma patients.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Pleura-ABCDE - a structured expert-based protocol for neonatal lung ultrasound documentation and interpretation.The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
- LongVentKids: how long is too long?-are we speaking the same language?Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Intensive Care Unit Nurses Regarding Critical Care Ultrasound: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southwestern China.Nursing in critical care · 2025Article
- Surfactant treatment rate in very premature infants following change to less-invasive surfactant administration.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- The Use of Lung Ultrasound Rather than Chest X-Ray to Diagnose Neonatal Lung Disease: Time for Action.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Value of combining lung ultrasound score with oxygenation and functional indices in determining weaning timing for critically ill pediatric patients.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Lung ultrasound in the management of mechanical ventilation in pediatric critical care: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Respiratory Physiotherapy Interventions in Paediatric Population with Atelectasis: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Pneumothorax in Very Preterm Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Setting the Standards: Neonatal Lung Ultrasound in Clinical Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Applications of Point-of-Care-Ultrasound in Neonatology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Imaging of Acute Complications of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Paediatric Population-From Chest Radiography to MRI.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Editorial: Applications of lung ultrasound in neonatology and pediatrics.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the realm of emergency medicine, the swift adoption of lung ultrasound (LU) has extended from the adult population to encompass pediatric and neonatal intensivists. LU stands out as a bedside, replicable, and cost-effective modality, distinct in its avoidance of ionizing radiations, a departure from conventional chest radiography. Recent years have witnessed a seamless adaptation of experiences gained in the adult setting to the neonatal and pediatric contexts, underscoring the versatility of bedside Point of care ultrasound (POCUS). This adaptability has proven reliable in diagnosing common pathologies and executing therapeutic interventions, including chest drainage, and central and peripheral vascular cannulation. The surge in POCUS utilization among neonatologists and pediatric intensivists is notable, spanning economically advanced Western nations with sophisticated, high-cost intensive care facilities and extending to low-income countries. Within the neonatal and pediatric population, POCUS has become integral for diagnosing and monitoring respiratory infections and chronic and acute lung pathologies. This, in turn, contributes to a reduction in radiation exposure during critical periods of growth, thereby mitigating oncological risks. Collaboration among various national and international societies has led to the formulation of guidelines addressing both the clinical application and regulatory aspects of operator training. Nevertheless, unified guidelines specific to the pediatric and neonatal population remain lacking, in contrast to the well-established protocols for adults. The initial application of POCUS in neonatal and pediatric settings centered on goal-directed echocardiography. Pivotal developments include expert statements in 2011, the UK consensus statement on echocardiography by neonatologists, and European training recommendations. The Australian Clinician Performed Ultrasound (CPU) program has played a crucial role, providing a robust academic curriculum tailored for training neonatologists in cerebral and cardiac assessment. Notably, the European Society for Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) recently disseminated evidence-based guidelines through an international panel, delineating the use and applications of POCUS in the pediatric setting. These guidelines are pertinent to any professional tending to critically ill children in routine or emergency scenarios. In light of the burgeoning literature, this paper will succinctly elucidate the methodology of performing an LU scan and underscore its primary indications in the neonatal and pediatric patient cohort. The focal points of this review comprise as follows: (1) methodology for conducting a lung ultrasound scan, (2) key ultrasonographic features characterizing a healthy lung, and (3) the functional approach: Lung Ultrasound Score in the child and the neonate. Conclusion: the aim of this review is to discuss the following key points: 1. How to perform a lung ultrasound scan 2. Main ultrasonographic features of the healthy lung 3. The functional approach: Lung Ultrasound Score in the child and the neonate What is Known: • Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is applied in pediatric and neonatal age for the diagnosis of pneumothorax, consolidation, and pleural effusion. • Recently, LUS has been introduced into clinical practice as a bedside diagnostic method for monitoring surfactant use in NARDS and lung recruitment in PARDS. What is New: • Lung Ultrasound (LUS) has proven to be useful in confirming diagnoses of pneumothorax, consolidation, and pleural effusion. • Furthermore, it has demonstrated effectiveness in monitoring the response to surfactant therapy in neonates, in staging the severity of bronchiolitis, and in PARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.