Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38126757›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgery2024

The Impact of Portal Hypertension Assessment Method on the Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resection: A Meta-Analysis of Matched Cohort and Prospective Studies.

Daniel Aliseda, Gabriel Zozaya, Pablo Martí-Cruchaga, Ignacio Herrero, Mercedes Iñarrairaegui, Josepmaría Argemí, Antonio Martínez De La Cuesta, Nuria Blanco, Lucas Sabatella, Bruno Sangro and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel AlisedaHPB and Liver Transplant Unit Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Gabriel ZozayaHPB and Liver Transplant Unit Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Pablo Martí-CruchagaHPB and Liver Transplant Unit Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ignacio HerreroInstitute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Mercedes IñarrairaeguiInstitute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Josepmaría ArgemíInstitute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Antonio Martínez De La CuestaInstitute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Nuria BlancoHPB and Liver Transplant Unit Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Lucas SabatellaHPB and Liver Transplant Unit Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Bruno SangroInstitute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Fernando RotellarHPB and Liver Transplant Unit Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESNavarre Institute of Health Research · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExamine portal hypertension (PHT) impact on postoperative and survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after liver resection (LR), specifically exploring distinctions between indirect signs and invasive measurements of PHT.

backgroundPHT has historically discouraged LR in individuals with HCC due to the elevated risk of morbidity, including liver decompensation (LD).

methodsA systematic review was conducted using 3 databases to identify prospective-controlled and matched cohort studies until December 28, 2022. Focus on comparing postoperative outcomes (mortality, morbidity, and liver-related complications) and overall survival in HCC patients with and without PHT undergoing LR. Three meta-analysis models were utilized: for aggregated data (fixed-effects inverse variance model), for patient-level survival data (one-stage frequentist meta-analysis with gamma-shared frailty Cox proportional hazards model), and for pooled data (Freeman-Tukey exact and double arcsine method).

resultsNine studies involving 1124 patients were analyzed. Indirect signs of PHT were not significantly associated with higher mortality, overall complications, PHLF or LD. However, LR in patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mm Hg significantly increased the risk of overall complications, PHLF, and LD. Despite elevated risks, the procedure resulted in a 5-year overall survival rate of 55.2%. Open LR significantly increased the risk of overall complications, PHLF, and LD. Conversely, PHT did not show a significant association with worse postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive LR.

conclusionsLR in the presence of indirect signs of PHT poses no increased risk of complications. Yet, in HVPG ≥10 mm Hg patients, LR increases overall morbidity and liver-related complications risk. Transjugular HVPG assessment is crucial for LR decisions. Minimally invasive approach seems to be vital for favorable outcomes, especially in HVPG ≥10 mm Hg patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatectomyHypertension, PortalLiver NeoplasmsHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38126757
OpenAlexW4390060388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.