Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38126740›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2024

Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Predicts Immunotherapy Response in Solid Tumors Based on PD-L1 Expression.

Marta Ligero, Garazi Serna, Omar S M El Nahhas, Irene Sansano, Siarhei Mauchanski, Cristina Viaplana, Julien Calderaro, Rodrigo A Toledo, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Rami S Vanguri and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Marta LigeroRadiomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9824-7316
Garazi SernaMolecular Oncology Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2666-0982
Omar S M El NahhasElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2542-2117
Irene SansanoPathology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (VHUH), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0188-5210
Siarhei MauchanskiMolecular Oncology Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7017-9654
Cristina ViaplanaOncology Data Science (ODysSey) Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-4330
Julien CalderaroAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département de Pathologie, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-0807
Rodrigo A ToledoBiomakers and Clonal Dynamics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3070-6795
Rodrigo DienstmannOncology Data Science (ODysSey) Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5997-318X
Rami S VanguriDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-8049-4829
Jennifer L SauterDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-2294
Francisco Sanchez-VegaComputational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2990-4893
Sohrab P ShahComputational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6402-523X
Santiago Ramón Y CajalPathology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (VHUH), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3867-1390
Elena GarraldaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4412-7842
Paolo NuciforoMolecular Oncology Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1380-0990
Raquel Perez-Lopez *Radiomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9176-0130
Jakob Nikolas Kather *Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-5348

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC is the most commonly used biomarker for immunotherapy response. However, quantification of PD-L1 status in pathology slides is challenging. Neither manual quantification nor a computer-based mimicking of manual readouts is perfectly reproducible, and the predictive performance of both approaches regarding immunotherapy response is limited. In this study, we developed a deep learning (DL) method to predict PD-L1 status directly from raw IHC image data, without explicit intermediary steps such as cell detection or pigment quantification. We trained the weakly supervised model on PD-L1-stained slides from the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) cohort (N = 233) and validated it on the pan-cancer-Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) cohort (N = 108). We also investigated the performance of the model to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in terms of progression-free survival. In the pan-cancer-VHIO cohort, the performance was compared with tumor proportion score (TPS) and combined positive score (CPS). The DL model showed good performance in predicting PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1%) in both NSCLC-MSK and pan-cancer-VHIO cohort (AUC 0.88 ± 0.06 and 0.80 ± 0.03, respectively). The predicted PD-L1 status showed an improved association with response to ICIs [HR: 1.5 (95% confidence interval: 1-2.3), P = 0.049] compared with TPS [HR: 1.4 (0.96-2.2), P = 0.082] and CPS [HR: 1.2 (0.79-1.9), P = 0.386]. Notably, our explainability analysis showed that the model does not just look at the amount of brown pigment in the IHC slides, but also considers morphologic factors such as lymphocyte conglomerates. Overall, end-to-end weakly supervised DL shows potential for improving patient stratification for cancer immunotherapy by analyzing PD-L1 IHC, holistically integrating morphology and PD-L1 staining intensity. SIGNIFICANCE: The weakly supervised DL model to predict PD-L1 status from raw IHC data, integrating tumor staining intensity and morphology, enables enhanced patient stratification in cancer immunotherapy compared with traditional pathologist assessment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenHumansImmunotherapyB7-H1 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38126740
PMCPMC10782919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.