Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38126605›Full record

Trial reportSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2023

Compression pre-stapler firing and post-ignition wait during sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Medeni Sermet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05703035 (The Effects of Waiting 1 Minute During Stapling During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05703035 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Waiting 1 Minute During Stapling During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedeni ŞermetRan2022 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsStaple MisfireArmsstandby while firing staple
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Medeni SermetMD, PhD. Department of General Surgery, Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6119-0037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsufficient research exists on the stapling technique in and duration of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes using a 30-second precompression and post-firing waiting time without extra support for the stapling line. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Randomized controlled prospective study at a university hospital.

methodsThis study included 120 patients treated between January 2022 and February 2023. The patients were divided into the non-waiting group (T0) and waiting group (T1), each with 60 patients. Perioperative complications were analyzed using statistical tests.

resultsThe waiting group (T1) showed a significant reduction in the number of intraoperative bleeding points requiring intervention compared with the non-waiting group (T0) (81 versus 134, P < 0.05). In T0, postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels increased (P < 0.05) and hemoglobin levels decreased significantly (P <0.05). The study recorded 22 postoperative complications, accounting for 18.3% of all cases during the 30-day postoperative period.

conclusionsThe study concluded that the 30 sec + 30 sec stapling technique reduces perioperative bleeding, length of stay, and serious complication rates and is practical and effective for LSG. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov with registration code NCT05703035; link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05703035.

Indexed as

GastrectomyObesity, MorbidSurgical StaplingHumansLaparoscopyProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38126605
PMCPMC10727512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.