ArticleCadernos de saude publica2023
[Support for family caregivers of older people during the COVID-19 pandemic].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overburden of informal caregivers of older adults with Post-COVID Syndrome.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Factors associated with functional dependence in older adults with disabilities in Brazil: a study based on the 2019 National Health Survey.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
- The care of non-institutionalized ADL-dependent people in the Orcasitas neighborhood of Madrid (Spain) during the Covid-19 pandemic and its relationship with social inequalities, intergenerational dependency and survival.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to identify the type of support received by family caregivers of older people during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the associated socioeconomic health and care-related factors. Data from CUIDA-COVID study, an online questionnaire conducted from august to november 2020 (n = 4,820) were used. Three multiple models were built, with the following outcome: contracted support, family support, and lack of support. Independent variables related to socioeconomic, health, and care aspects were converted into dichotomous categories. Family support was the most common (48.6%), followed by lack of support (38.3%), and contracted support (13.1%). No significant associations were observed between race/skin color, poverty status, chronic back pain and negative mood with any type of support. Factors strongly associated (adjustedPR > 2.0) with contracted support were: the non-sharp decrease in income during the pandemic; non-dedication to full-time care; self-rated good/excellent health; and the high degree of dependence of the older individual. For family support, the main associations were: the non-marked increase in the effort to care during the pandemic, the non-dedication to full-time care and the sharp decrease in income during the pandemic. The characteristics associated with lack of support were: living with the older person; dedication to full-time care; living in households with 1 or 2 people; and report a sharp increase in effort to care during the pandemic. Overall, caregivers with contracted support had the best socioeconomic, care and health conditions. Lack of support was related to worse health and care conditions, while family support was related to worse socioeconomic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.