Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38126192›Full record

ArticleFood and nutrition bulletin2024

A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy-An Application of the Food Choice Process Model in Burkina Faso and Madagascar.

Raphia M Ngoutane, Laura E Murray-Kolb, Ramakwende Zoma, Césaire T Ouédraogo, Kesso Gabrielle van Zutphen, Rachel Bruning, Andry Razakandrainy, Elizabeth Ransom, Nita Dalmiya, Klaus Kraemer and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Food and nutrition bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Raphia M NgoutaneThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2361-4875
Laura E Murray-KolbPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Ramakwende ZomaThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Césaire T OuédraogoInternational Rescue Committee, Bamako, Mali.
Kesso Gabrielle van ZutphenSight and Life, Basel, Switzerland.
Rachel BruningThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Andry RazakandrainyGRET, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Elizabeth RansomThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Nita DalmiyaUnited National Children's Fund, New York, NY, USA.
Klaus KraemerSight and Life, Basel, Switzerland.
Stephen R KodishThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USSight and Life · CHChildren's Health Fund · USMali-Folkecenter · MLPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate nutrition has been cited as one of the most critical components for optimal health outcomes during pregnancy. Women in Burkina Faso and Madagascar experience high rates of undernutrition due to lack of knowledge, finances, cultural norms, and autonomy. Therefore, this study aimed (1) to describe typical maternal diets during pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar, (2) to understand the multilevel factors that influence women's nutrition decision-making, and (3) to explore the extent to which women have nutrition decision-making autonomy during pregnancy.

methodsThis study was conducted between October 2020 and February 2021 in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Semi-structured interviews, focus group interviews, and free lists were conducted among women of reproductive age and pregnant and lactating women. Textual data from interviews were recorded and translated verbatim from local languages into French. The Food Choice Process Model guided textual content analysis using

resultsIn Burkina Faso and Madagascar, women primarily consumed staple foods such as rice and tô during pregnancy. Participants cited eating fruits and vegetables when available, while the animal source foods were rarely consumed. Across both contexts, nutrition during pregnancy was influenced by factors that impact food choices, such as social factors, resources, ideals, and personal factors. While women and men in Madagascar had more shared decision-making on critical domains such as finances, men were the primary decision-makers in most areas of inquiry (eg, finances) in Burkina Faso.

conclusionsThe lack of adequate diverse diet consumed during pregnancy is primarily due to important factors including social factors and resources. Understanding the ability for women to consume optimal diets during pregnancy is needed to target behavioral change in maternal nutrition programming.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdolescentAdultBurkina FasoChoice BehaviorDietFemaleFood PreferencesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMadagascarNutritional StatusPersonal AutonomyPregnancyYoung AdultautonomyBurkina Fasofood choice process modelMadagascarmaternal nutritionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38126192
PMCPMC11047013
OpenAlexW4390052820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.