ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2024
Race, Sex, and Age Disparities in the Performance of ECG Deep Learning Models Predicting Heart Failure.
Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of clopidogrel monotherapy versus aspirin monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram-based prediction of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Wearable Electrocardiogram Technologies for the Early Detection of Acute Coronary Syndromes.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
- Big Data and Trustworthy AI for Heart Failure: A Review.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Review
- Demographic-aware temporal graph attention for fair and accurate cardiac abnormality detection in 12-lead ECG.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Evolving Utility of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools for the Detection of Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: From Potential to Implementation.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Enhanced Demographically Adaptive QT Correction Improves Pediatric Screening for Congenital Long QT Syndrome.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Implementation of Machine Learning in Heart Failure Trials.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Integrating multimodal intelligence in heart failure: AI-driven risk prediction, precision diagnosis, phenotyping, personalized treatment, and prognosis.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- The digital divide in cardiovascular care: who gets left behind?European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Multisite, External Validation of an AI-Enabled ECG Algorithm for Detection of Low Ejection Fraction.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Sex disparities in deep learning estimation of ejection fraction from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography from scientific research to clinical application.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Use of artificial intelligence for detecting left ventricular dysfunction and predicting incident heart failure risk.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography to predict regurgitant valvular heart diseases: an international study.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications and Future Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and ECG: A New Frontier in Cardiac Diagnostics and Prevention.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A deep learning phenome wide association study of the electrocardiogram.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an integrated prognostic model for all-cause mortality in heart failure: a comprehensive analysis combining clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning models may combat widening racial disparities in heart failure outcomes through early identification of individuals at high risk. However, demographic biases in the performance of these models have not been well-studied.
methodsThis retrospective analysis used 12-lead ECGs taken between 2008 and 2018 from 326 518 patient encounters referred for standard clinical indications to Stanford Hospital. The primary model was a convolutional neural network model trained to predict incident heart failure within 5 years. Biases were evaluated on the testing set (160 312 ECGs) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, stratified across the protected attributes of race, ethnicity, age, and sex.
resultsThere were 59 817 cases of incident heart failure observed within 5 years of ECG collection. The performance of the primary model declined with age. There were no significant differences observed between racial groups overall. However, the primary model performed significantly worse in Black patients aged 0 to 40 years compared with all other racial groups in this age group, with differences most pronounced among young Black women. Disparities in model performance did not improve with the integration of race, ethnicity, sex, and age into model architecture, by training separate models for each racial group, or by providing the model with a data set of equal racial representation. Using probability thresholds individualized for race, age, and sex offered substantial improvements in F1 scores.
conclusionsThe biases found in this study warrant caution against perpetuating disparities through the development of machine learning tools for the prognosis and management of heart failure. Customizing the application of these models by using probability thresholds individualized by race, ethnicity, age, and sex may offer an avenue to mitigate existing algorithmic disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.