Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38126168›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2024

Race, Sex, and Age Disparities in the Performance of ECG Deep Learning Models Predicting Heart Failure.

Dhamanpreet Kaur, J Weston Hughes, Albert J Rogers, Guson Kang, Sanjiv M Narayan, Euan A Ashley, Marco V Perez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The digital divide in cardiovascular care: who gets left behind?European heart journal. Digital health · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dhamanpreet KaurCardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, CA (D.K., J.W.H., A.J.R., S.M.N., E.A.A., M.V.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-6123-7499
J Weston HughesCardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, CA (D.K., J.W.H., A.J.R., S.M.N., E.A.A., M.V.P.).
Albert J RogersCardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, CA (D.K., J.W.H., A.J.R., S.M.N., E.A.A., M.V.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-6585-534X
Guson KangVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Cardiovascular Medicine, CA (G.K.).
Sanjiv M NarayanCardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, CA (D.K., J.W.H., A.J.R., S.M.N., E.A.A., M.V.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-7552-5053
Euan A AshleyCardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, CA (D.K., J.W.H., A.J.R., S.M.N., E.A.A., M.V.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-9418-9577
Marco V PerezCardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, CA (D.K., J.W.H., A.J.R., S.M.N., E.A.A., M.V.P.).ORCID 0000-0003-2746-0202

Funding

The Dynamics of Human Atrial FibrillationR01HL083359 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sanjiv M Narayan · 2008 to 2026
$7.9M
Machine Learning in Atrial FibrillationR01HL149134 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
Machine Learning for Ventricular ArrhythmiasR01HL162260 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Sanjiv M Narayan · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Electrical Mapping Signatures of Adverse Structural and Functional Remodeling in Ventricular ArrhythmiaK23HL166977 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Albert Joseph Rogers · 2023 to 2026
$680k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL166977NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL143631NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083359NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149134NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL162260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning models may combat widening racial disparities in heart failure outcomes through early identification of individuals at high risk. However, demographic biases in the performance of these models have not been well-studied.

methodsThis retrospective analysis used 12-lead ECGs taken between 2008 and 2018 from 326 518 patient encounters referred for standard clinical indications to Stanford Hospital. The primary model was a convolutional neural network model trained to predict incident heart failure within 5 years. Biases were evaluated on the testing set (160 312 ECGs) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, stratified across the protected attributes of race, ethnicity, age, and sex.

resultsThere were 59 817 cases of incident heart failure observed within 5 years of ECG collection. The performance of the primary model declined with age. There were no significant differences observed between racial groups overall. However, the primary model performed significantly worse in Black patients aged 0 to 40 years compared with all other racial groups in this age group, with differences most pronounced among young Black women. Disparities in model performance did not improve with the integration of race, ethnicity, sex, and age into model architecture, by training separate models for each racial group, or by providing the model with a data set of equal racial representation. Using probability thresholds individualized for race, age, and sex offered substantial improvements in F1 scores.

conclusionsThe biases found in this study warrant caution against perpetuating disparities through the development of machine learning tools for the prognosis and management of heart failure. Customizing the application of these models by using probability thresholds individualized by race, ethnicity, age, and sex may offer an avenue to mitigate existing algorithmic disparities.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHeart FailureElectrocardiographyEthnicityFemaleHumansRetrospective Studiesdeep learningelectrocardiographyhealthcare disparitiesheart failure

Identifiers

PMID38126168
PMCPMC10984643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.