Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38126044›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2023

The Impact of Preoperative Patient Education on Postoperative Pain, Opioid Use, and Psychological Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Rasheeda Darville-Beneby, Anna M Lomanowska, Hai Chuan Yu, Parker Jobin, Brittany N Rosenbloom, Gretchen Gabriel, Helena Daudt, Michael Negraeff, Tania Di Renna, Maria Hudspith and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors: a clinical practice review for healthcare providers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Factors influencing optimal postoperative pain management: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rasheeda Darville-BenebyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anna M LomanowskaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management Pain Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hai Chuan YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Parker JobinDepartment of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5852-7890
Brittany N RosenbloomTransitional Pain Service, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gretchen GabrielDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Helena DaudtPain BC/Pain Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael NegraeffPain BC/Pain Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tania Di RennaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maria HudspithPain BC/Pain Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hance ClarkeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CACedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHospital for Sick Children · CAToronto General Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown that preoperative education can positively impact postoperative recovery, improving postoperative pain management and patient satisfaction. Gaps in preoperative education regarding postoperative pain and opioid use may lead to increased patient anxiety and persistent postoperative opioid use. Objectives: The objective of this narrative review was to identify, examine, and summarize the available evidence on the use and effectiveness of preoperative educational interventions with respect to postoperative outcomes. Method: The current narrative review focused on studies that assessed the impact of preoperative educational interventions on postoperative pain, opioid use, and psychological outcomes. The search strategy used concept blocks including "preoperative" AND "patient education" AND "elective surgery," limited to the English language, humans, and adults, using the MEDLINE ALL database. Studies reporting on preoperative educational interventions that included postoperative outcomes were included. Studies reporting on enhanced recovery after surgery protocols were excluded. Results: From a total of 761 retrieved articles, 721 were screened in full and 34 met criteria for inclusion. Of 12 studies that assessed the impact of preoperative educational interventions on postoperative pain, 5 reported a benefit for pain reduction. Eight studies examined postoperative opioid use, and all found a significant reduction in opioid consumption after preoperative education. Twenty-four studies reported on postoperative psychological outcomes, and 20 of these showed benefits of preoperative education, especially on postoperative anxiety. Conclusion: Preoperative patient education interventions demonstrate promise for improving postoperative outcomes. Preoperative education programs should become a prerequisite and an available resource for all patients undergoing elective surgery.

Indexed as

elective surgerypatient educationpreoperative

Identifiers

PMID38126044
PMCPMC10732618
OpenAlexW4387408076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.