Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38126010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Simulation and optimization of nutrient uptake and biomass formation using a multi-parameter Monod-type model of tobacco BY-2 cell suspension cultures in a stirred-tank bioreactor.

Henrik Nausch, Marco Baldan, Katrin Teichert, Jannik Lutz, Carsten Claussen, Michael Bortz, Johannes Felix Buyel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Henrik Nausch *Department Bioprocess Engineering, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany.
Marco Baldan *Division Optimization, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Katrin TeichertDivision Optimization, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Jannik LutzDepartment Bioprocess Engineering, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany.
Carsten ClaussenFraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael BortzDivision Optimization, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Johannes Felix BuyelDepartment Bioprocess Engineering, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco ( Methods: Here we developed an iterative experiment-modeling-optimization workflow to gradually refine such a model and its predictions, based on collected data concerning BY-2 cell macronutrient consumption (sucrose, ammonium, nitrate and phosphate) and biomass formation. Results and discussion: The biomass formation was well predicted by an unstructured segregated mechanistic Monod-type model as long as the nutrient concentrations did not approach zero (we omitted phosphate, which was completely depleted). Multi-criteria optimization for sucrose and biomass formation indicated the best tradeoff (in a Paretian sense) between maximum biomass yield and minimum process time by reducing the initial sucrose concentration, whereas the inoculation biomass could be increased to maximize the biomass yield or minimize the process time, which we confirmed in calibration experiments. The model became inaccurate at biomass densities > 8 g L

Indexed as

biopharmaceuticalscultivation mediummechanistic modelmulti-criteria optimizationupstream production

Identifiers

PMID38126010
PMCPMC10731461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.