ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Feasibility of monitoring Global Breast Cancer Initiative Framework key performance indicators in 21 Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance member countries.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The role of wearable technologies in supporting physical and psychosocial health outcomes among breast cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Socioeconomic factors affecting breast and cervical cancer screening compliance in Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance countries: a systematic review.Epidemiology and health · 2025Pooled it
- Physical activity and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.Breast disease · 2024Pooled it
- Molecular dynamics and predictive toxicity insights into theaflavin as a potential inhibitor of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in breast cancer.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Global breast cancer survival estimates in 2017-2021 to advance the WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Folate-directed morin nano-gold decorated with chitosan: a multifunctional arsenal against triple-negative breast cancer and AMR superbugs.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- The relationship between self-efficacy and self-advocacy among young and middle-aged Chinese breast cancer patients: the mediating effect of health literacy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Assessing Delay Patterns in Diagnosis and Care Among Breast Cancer Patients in Ethiopia.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Research progress and trends on M2 macrophages in breast cancer research: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Novel SOAT inhibitors block DHEAS transport and suppress proliferation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improving Breast Cancer Outcomes Through Quality Care: Call to Action for the Implementation of the Breast Cancer Care Quality Index (BCCQI).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- GLUT1 Bioactive Triterpenoids fromACS omega · 2025Article
- Advancing breast cancer research through real-world data from the Singapore Joint Breast Cancer Registry.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- Breast cancer incidence in Indonesia: a sex-disaggregated analysis using WHO health equity assessment toolkit data.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Delays in follow-up among women with abnormal results: a retrospective study based on population-based breast cancer screening programme in China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The role of social comparative orientation in social anxiety among breast cancer survivors: a moderated mediation model of body image and self-concept clarity.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Breast cancer treatment modalities, treatment delays, and survival in Brunei Darussalam.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Measuring the WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative Pillars' key performance indicators in Sub-Saharan Africa: experience in the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes hospital-based cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Global Breast Cancer Initiative (GBCI) Framework, launched by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2023, emphasises assessing, strengthening, and scaling up services for the early detection and management of breast cancer. This study aims to determine the feasibility of monitoring the status of breast cancer control in the 21 Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance (ANCCA) countries based on the three GBCI Framework key performance indicators (KPIs): stage at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and treatment completion. Methods: We reviewed published literature on breast cancer control among 21 ANCCA countries from May to July 2023 to establish data availability and compiled the latest descriptive statistics and sources of the indicators using a standardised data collection form. We performed bivariate Pearson's correlation analysis to measure the strength of correlation between stage at diagnosis, mortality and survival rates, and universal health coverage. Findings: Only 12 (57%) ANCCA member countries published national cancer registry reports on breast cancer age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) and age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR). Indonesia, Myanmar, and Nepal had provincial data and others relied on WHO's Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) estimates. GLOBOCAN data differed from the reported national statistics by 5-10% in Bhutan, Indonesia, Iran, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Thailand and >10% in China, India, Malaysia, Mongolia, and Sri Lanka. The proportion of patients diagnosed in stages I and II strongly correlated with the five-year survival rate and with the universal health coverage (UHC) index. Three countries (14%) reported national data with >60% of invasive breast cancer patients diagnosed at stages I and II, and a five-year survival rate of >80%. Over 60% of the ANCCA countries had no published national data on breast cancer staging, the time interval from presentation to diagnosis, and diagnosis to treatment. Five (24%) countries reported data on treatment completion. The definition of delayed diagnosis and treatment completion varied across countries. Interpretation: GBCI's Pillar 1 KPI correlates strongly with five-year survival rate and with the UHC index. Most ANCCA countries lacked national data on cancer staging, timely diagnosis, and treatment completion KPIs. While institutional-level data were available in some countries, they may not represent the nationwide status. Strengthening cancer surveillance is crucial for effective breast cancer control. The GBCI Framework indicators warrant more detailed definitions for standardised data collection. Surrogate indicators which are measurable and manageable in country-specific settings, could be considered for monitoring GBCI indicators. Ensuring UHC and addressing health inequalities are essential to early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Funding: Funding for this research article's processing fee (APC) will be provided by the affiliated institution to support the open-access publication of this work. The funding body is not involved in the study design; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data; or the decision to submit for publication. The funding body will be informed of any planned publications, and documentation provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.