ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2023
Usefulness of Stanch Belt Plus in Postoperative Management after Endovascular Neurosurgery.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We verified the usefulness of patient management using a balloon-pressurized belt (Stanch Belt Plus) to prevent puncture site hematomas, which can occur at a specific rate even with hemostatic devices after endovascular neurosurgery. Methods: A total of 113 patients who underwent endovascular surgery with a femoral puncture from April 2019 to September 2020 were divided into two groups: 31 cases using a traditional compression belt and 82 cases using a newly introduced balloon-pressurized belt during this period. The clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. The chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to test for significant differences. Results: There were no significant differences in treatment procedures or frequency of hemostatic device use, but the balloon-pressurized belt group had a significantly lower incidence of hematomas (2.4% vs 12.9%, p <0.05) and a significantly lower incidence of moderate or higher lumbago (22.0% vs 41.9%, p <0.05). The incidence of epidermal detachment tended to be low; however, no significant difference was observed (3.7% vs. 12.9%, n.s.). Conclusion: Patient management with the newly introduced balloon-pressurized belt may decrease the occurrence of groin hematoma and lumbago among complications after endovascular neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.