ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023
Deep learning enhances acute lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosis and classification using bone marrow images.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for the detection of acute myeloid leukemia from microscopic blood images; a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in big data · 2024Pooled it
- Automated Detection and Classification of Pleural Effusion on Computed Tomography Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Demystifying Deep Learning Decisions in Leukemia Diagnostics Using Explainable AI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated bone marrow cell classification using ensemble learning: performance, generalization, and clinical interpretability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A personalized communication efficient federated learning framework with low rank adaptation for intelligent leukemia diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial inteligence and datasets for leukemia diagnosis: A scoping review of machine lerning and deep learning approaches.MethodsX · 2025Review
- Neuro-Bridge-X: A Neuro-Symbolic Vision Transformer with Meta-XAI for Interpretable Leukemia Diagnosis from Peripheral Blood Smears.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Oncology Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Advances in Medical Image Processing, Segmentation, and Classification".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CausalFormer-HMC: a hybrid memory-driven transformer with causal reasoning and counterfactual explainability for leukemia diagnosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: A Narrative Review of Current Knowledge and Advancements.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Optimization of diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases via artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Cytopathology 2.0: How Artificial Intelligence Is Redefining the Future of Cytopathology.Journal of cytologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) poses a significant health challenge, particularly in pediatric cases, requiring precise and rapid diagnostic approaches. This comprehensive review explores the transformative capacity of deep learning (DL) in enhancing ALL diagnosis and classification, focusing on bone marrow image analysis. Examining ten studies conducted between 2013 and 2023 across various countries, including India, China, KSA, and Mexico, the synthesis underscores the adaptability and proficiency of DL methodologies in detecting leukemia. Innovative DL models, notably Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with Cat-Boosting, XG-Boosting, and Transfer Learning techniques, demonstrate notable approaches. Some models achieve outstanding accuracy, with one CNN reaching 100% in cancer cell classification. The incorporation of novel algorithms like Cat-Swarm Optimization and specialized CNN architectures contributes to superior classification accuracy. Performance metrics highlight these achievements, with models consistently outperforming traditional diagnostic methods. For instance, a CNN with Cat-Boosting attains 100% accuracy, while others hover around 99%, showcasing DL models' robustness in ALL diagnosis. Despite acknowledged challenges, such as the need for larger and more diverse datasets, these findings underscore DL's transformative potential in reshaping leukemia diagnostics. The high numerical accuracies accentuate a promising trajectory toward more efficient and accurate ALL diagnosis in clinical settings, prompting ongoing research to address challenges and refine DL models for optimal clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.