ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2024
Quantitative photoacoustic tomography: modeling and inverse problems.
Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- A virtual imaging framework for three-dimensional quantitative optoacoustic tomography using stochastic numerical breast phantoms.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- FBS-DiffNet: a deep unfolding network with diffusion prior for joint reconstruction of optical absorption and sound speed in photoacoustic tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- A multimodal adjoint-state formulation of Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography with external acoustic sources.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- OpenQPAIData: Measurements of test objects with reference labels for quantitative photoacoustic imaging research.Scientific data · 2026Article
- PIT-Net: Physics-informed transformer with differentiable diffusion constraints for quantitative photoacoustic tomography of deep tissues.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Quantitative evaluation of key factors influencing hepatic oxygen saturation measurement by photoacoustic imaging in mice.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- The confounding effects of skin colour in photoacoustic imaging.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Data-driven super-resolution optoacoustic imaging via physically encoded signal acquisition.Research square · 2026Article
- Geometry-dependent reachability, homogenization, and redundancy in multi-view photoacoustic illumination.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Application of a virtual imaging framework for investigating a deep learning-based reconstruction method for 3D quantitative photoacoustic computed tomography.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Clinical translation of photoacoustic imaging using exogenous molecular contrast agents [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2025Review
- Artifacts in photoacoustic imaging: Origins and mitigations.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Towards bridging the synthetic-to-real gap in quantitative photoacoustic tomography via unsupervised domain adaptation.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Towards quantitative ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) for radiation dose measurement: Validation from simulations to experiments.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Scale-equivariant deep model-based optoacoustic image reconstruction.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Probing the photophysical properties of fluorescent proteins using photoacoustic pump-probe spectroscopy and imaging.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Depth-dependent fluence compensation withoutJournal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Quantitative photoacoustic imaging algorithm using sparse decomposition for photoacoustic and ultrasound dual-mode imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Quantitative assessment of thrombosis-induced blood oxygenation change in deep tissues based on photoacoustic tomography: anBiomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Quantitative photoacoustic imaging using known chromophores as fluence marker.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Quantitative photoacoustic tomography (QPAT) exploits the photoacoustic effect with the aim of estimating images of clinically relevant quantities related to the tissue's optical absorption. The technique has two aspects: an acoustic part, where the initial acoustic pressure distribution is estimated from measured photoacoustic time-series, and an optical part, where the distributions of the optical parameters are estimated from the initial pressure. Aim: Our study is focused on the optical part. In particular, computational modeling of light propagation (forward problem) and numerical solution methodologies of the image reconstruction (inverse problem) are discussed. Approach: The commonly used mathematical models of how light and sound propagate in biological tissue are reviewed. A short overview of how the acoustic inverse problem is usually treated is given. The optical inverse problem and methods for its solution are reviewed. In addition, some limitations of real-life measurements and their effect on the inverse problems are discussed. Results: An overview of QPAT with a focus on the optical part was given. Computational modeling and inverse problems of QPAT were addressed, and some key challenges were discussed. Furthermore, the developments for tackling these problems were reviewed. Although modeling of light transport is well-understood and there is a well-developed framework of inverse mathematics for approaching the inverse problem of QPAT, there are still challenges in taking these methodologies to practice. Conclusions: Modeling and inverse problems of QPAT together were discussed. The scope was limited to the optical part, and the acoustic aspects were discussed only to the extent that they relate to the optical aspect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.