ArticleCureus2023
Bone Scans in Preoperative Investigations of Breast Cancer Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer constitutes about 28% of all new cancer diagnoses in women, making it the most frequently diagnosed cancer among them. Our objective was to assess the role of bone scans (BS) in preoperative investigations of breast cancer.
methodsThis study involved 105 patients with varying stages of breast cancer, ranging from T1 to T4. We categorized them into three groups: group 1 comprised 40 women with breast cancer who underwent retrospective BS, group 2 included 30 patients with breast cancer who prospectively did not require BS for all cases, and group 3 consisted of 35 women retrospectively diagnosed with breast cancer who did not necessitate BS for all cases. The diagnosis of bone metastasis was confirmed upon obtaining a positive result through bone scintigraphy, subsequently affirmed by another imaging technique such as CT, X-ray, or MRI.
resultsThe hospital costs were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 compared to that of group 1, indicating that performing a BS for every case is unnecessary. It was observed that the time taken for surgery was notably shorter in groups 2 and 3 compared to that of group 1. BS in cases classified as M stage were deemed both costly and time-consuming.
conclusionsRoutine BS are not cost-effective and represent an unnecessary investment of time. They should not be deemed mandatory as preoperative investigations in breast cancer cases. Instead, they should be considered in conjunction with MRI, particularly in cases of T4 breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.