Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38125675›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing2022

High Performance Adaptive Physics Refinement to Enable Large-Scale Tracking of Cancer Cell Trajectory.

Daniel F Puleri, Sayan Roychowdhury, Peter Balogh, John Gounley, Erik W Draeger, Jeff Ames, Adebayo Adebiyi, Simbarashe Chidyagwai, Benjamín Hernández, Seyong Lee and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Enhancing Adaptive Physics Refinement Simulations Through the Addition of Realistic Red Blood Cell Counts.International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis : [proceedings]. SC (Conference : Supercomputing) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel F PuleriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sayan RoychowdhuryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Peter BaloghMechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
John Gounley{Computational Sciences and Engineering, National Center for Computational Sciences, Computer Science and Mathematics}, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Erik W DraegerScientific Computing Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Jeff AmesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Adebayo AdebiyiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Simbarashe ChidyagwaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Benjamín Hernández{Computational Sciences and Engineering, National Center for Computational Sciences, Computer Science and Mathematics}, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Seyong Lee{Computational Sciences and Engineering, National Center for Computational Sciences, Computer Science and Mathematics}, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Shirley V MooreDepartment of Computer Science, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.
Jeffrey S Vetter{Computational Sciences and Engineering, National Center for Computational Sciences, Computer Science and Mathematics}, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Amanda RandlesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USThe University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

Technology for efficient simulation of cancer cell transportU01CA253511 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RANDLES, AMANDA E · 2020 to 2022
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to track simulated cancer cells through the circulatory system, important for developing a mechanistic understanding of metastatic spread, pushes the limits of today's supercomputers by requiring the simulation of large fluid volumes at cellular-scale resolution. To overcome this challenge, we introduce a new adaptive physics refinement (APR) method that captures cellular-scale interaction across large domains and leverages a hybrid CPU-GPU approach to maximize performance. Through algorithmic advances that integrate multi-physics and multi-resolution models, we establish a finely resolved window with explicitly modeled cells coupled to a coarsely resolved bulk fluid domain. In this work we present multiple validations of the APR framework by comparing against fully resolved fluid-structure interaction methods and employ techniques, such as latency hiding and maximizing memory bandwidth, to effectively utilize heterogeneous node architectures. Collectively, these computational developments and performance optimizations provide a robust and scalable framework to enable system-level simulations of cancer cell transport.

Indexed as

cancer metastasisdeformable cellsheterogeneous architecturesimmersed boundarymultiphysics

Identifiers

PMID38125675
PMCPMC10731912
OpenAlexW4308044549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.