Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38125614›Full record

ArticleBiochemia medica2024

Point of care testing in Croatia: a survey of the Working group for point of care testing of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine.

Ivana Baršić Lapić, Lara Milevoj Kopčinović, Nedjeljka Ruljančić, Marija Grdić Rajković, Maja Kuštro

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ivana Baršić LapićDepartment for Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Lara Milevoj KopčinovićDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nedjeljka RuljančićMedical Biochemistry Laboratory, University Psychiatric Hospital Sveti Ivan, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marija Grdić RajkovićDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Hematology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Maja KuštroDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, General Hospital Dubrovnik, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
Psychiatric Hospital Sveti Ivan · HRUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Dubrovnik · HRUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate attitudes and routine procedures in point of care testing (POCT) among non-laboratory and laboratory healthcare professionals in Croatia. Materials and methods: The Working Group (WG) for POCT of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine has designed two anonymous surveys for laboratory staff and non-laboratory staff with a total of 44 questions/statements on POCT (27 questions for non-laboratory staff and 17 for laboratory staff). Surveys were sent to 184 medical biochemistry laboratory (MBL) managers, the Croatian medical chamber and the Croatian chamber of nurses. The survey was disseminated using the online survey platform SurveyMonkey. Results: A total of 112 non-laboratory healthcare professionals and 50 laboratories participated in the survey, which represents a response rate of 0.25% for non-laboratory professionals and 27% for MBLs. The majority of non-laboratory staff stated that POCT enables better medical care for the patient (90/112) and that the implementation of new POCT devices should be the responsibility of a POCT team comprising laboratory and clinical healthcare professionals. The great majority of responding MBLs (42/50) acknowledge that POCT is necessary for better patient care, and also realize that validation of POCT devices and comparison to the central laboratory is necessary before implementation (49/50). Conclusions: The majority of participants consider POCT as a medical tool that enables better patient care but there is still a lack of communication between laboratory and clinical staff. The study identified some critical spots that will help to create national guidelines to ensure high patient safety when using POCT devices.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesPoint-of-Care TestingBiochemistryCroatiaHumansSurveys and Questionnairespoint of carequality controlquestionnairesstandardization

Identifiers

PMID38125614
PMCPMC10731733
OpenAlexW4389949100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.